My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 1999-06-16
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 1999-06-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:10:38 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 2:42:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
6/16/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-06-16 SP MTG
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />would have an executive session? <br />PRANKE: Yes, that's totally wrong. They can say I would like to go into executive <br />session but then the board needs to meet but that's not the way it's written and most <br />boards have taken it to say okay, the County Charter is what we go by, not the <br />Sunshine Law but the Sunshine Law is a law of general applicability. It applies to all <br />states, all state agencies, all county agencies that hold regular meetings. <br />IRVINE: It sounded to me though, like you were complaining about the way that <br />these commissions here ran their meetings because they're not really in compliance <br />with the Charter as it is now. You know what I mean? <br />PRANKE: Well, that may be too. Yes, that may be too. I find it very difficult to <br />swallow sometime when we go there and they go into executive session based simply <br />on the fact that somebody asked. That may also be a violation of the County Charter <br />too, but certainly just going in on the request of somebody. They say I would like to go <br />into executive session. There's a whole lot of paper here but in essence, in one of <br />these executive minutes, the person asking for the executive, or in the general minutes, <br />the person asking for the executive session says he asked Rudy, meaning Rudy <br />Legaspi in this case, told me to ask for it and so that's what I want to do. They had no <br />reason for it, I mean there was no specific personal thing. I don't want to know <br />somebody's personal information. I think what I was looking for, I'm sorry, 13.5. <br />There's something in this that tends to - <br />RAY Page 30. <br />PRANKE: Page what? <br />RAY: 30. <br />PRANKE: Yes, that's records, okay, I'm sorry. There was something in here that I <br />think might have been a technical error. In the second sentence it says 'Where <br />personal matters affecting the privacy of an individual are to be considered'. There's a <br />difference between personal and personnel and in the executive, in the reasons for <br />going into executive session, 92-5, it says 'a board may hold a closed meeting to <br />consider and evaluate personal information relating to individuals applying for <br />professional or vocational licenses'. We don't have too much of that going on and the <br />Police Commission is not doing that. When they say it's personal, that's not quite <br />correct. My name is personal but it's not private. I think that was meant to say <br />personnel but I don't know that. I think there's a typo in there that followed through <br />from, probably from the beginning of the Charter. But nowhere in there does it say <br />personal information. Privacy is considered but personal is probably not a good word <br />to use in there. I'm sorry, I go on and on. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.