Laserfiche WebLink
• HIGASHI: Just one word, Ginny. We will be holding agendized items later on - <br />nonpartisan elections, getting some background and also getting background on the <br />Managing Director form of government so watch the paper and when you see that on <br />the agenda, please come back. <br />ASTE: Okay. <br />IRVINE: Either August 11th or 25th actually. <br />HIGASHI: Next speaker, Jon Olson. <br />OLSON: Yes, thank you. My name is Jon Olson. Basically, I guess I'm going to <br />expand upon what Ginny has said. These all have to do with Boards and <br />Commissions. My proposal would be to expand the membership of all Boards and <br />Commissions to 10 members. There being one member for each Council Districtplus <br />one alternate for each Council District. I know that each one of you have all sat on <br />Boards and Commissions where we've all waited for a quorum to appear and I think, in <br />the interest of the public and the people who are donating their time, if you had an <br />alternate, it would increase the likelihood that the Board or Commission could move <br />forward with its business. The appointment by Council District would more closely <br />mirror the change from the Council people being elected at large to being elected by <br />• District which is what we have now. The Mayor, of course, would elect the Chairperson <br />and the Chairperson would, as by Roberts Rules, vote to either make or break a tie. <br />Moving on to the Department of Taxation idea and itemization. I think the answer to <br />your question is "not exactly." The property owner would simply know the amount of <br />money that he paid into roads county wide or solid waste county wide and I think that <br />probably to ask them to break it out too much more than that would probably be <br />cumbersome at this point. But you'd certainly want to know, and of course at that point, <br />you could find out from your Council person if you were interested, how much money <br />that department, the Road Department, spent in your district from that point on. You'd <br />be able to break it down pretty well. And of course, when things like sewer bonding <br />shows up on your tax bill, you know that your district doesn't have any. <br />The other thing is that I think that there has been some talk about having a special <br />election to move this process along and I don't think, economically, that makes any <br />sense or in terms of input from the public. I think that this process is going to take a <br />little time. And as a question of information, the input that is going to this body now, is <br />that going to be summarized somewhere? And then there's going to be what, yet <br />another round of meetings to have discussion about that input? <br />HIGASHI: Yes. <br />• <br />