My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 1999-07-21
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 1999-07-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 10:54:39 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 2:52:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
7/21/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-07-21 SP MTG
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• HIGASHI: Just one word, Ginny. We will be holding agendized items later on - <br />nonpartisan elections, getting some background and also getting background on the <br />Managing Director form of government so watch the paper and when you see that on <br />the agenda, please come back. <br />ASTE: Okay. <br />IRVINE: Either August 11th or 25th actually. <br />HIGASHI: Next speaker, Jon Olson. <br />OLSON: Yes, thank you. My name is Jon Olson. Basically, I guess I'm going to <br />expand upon what Ginny has said. These all have to do with Boards and <br />Commissions. My proposal would be to expand the membership of all Boards and <br />Commissions to 10 members. There being one member for each Council Districtplus <br />one alternate for each Council District. I know that each one of you have all sat on <br />Boards and Commissions where we've all waited for a quorum to appear and I think, in <br />the interest of the public and the people who are donating their time, if you had an <br />alternate, it would increase the likelihood that the Board or Commission could move <br />forward with its business. The appointment by Council District would more closely <br />mirror the change from the Council people being elected at large to being elected by <br />• District which is what we have now. The Mayor, of course, would elect the Chairperson <br />and the Chairperson would, as by Roberts Rules, vote to either make or break a tie. <br />Moving on to the Department of Taxation idea and itemization. I think the answer to <br />your question is "not exactly." The property owner would simply know the amount of <br />money that he paid into roads county wide or solid waste county wide and I think that <br />probably to ask them to break it out too much more than that would probably be <br />cumbersome at this point. But you'd certainly want to know, and of course at that point, <br />you could find out from your Council person if you were interested, how much money <br />that department, the Road Department, spent in your district from that point on. You'd <br />be able to break it down pretty well. And of course, when things like sewer bonding <br />shows up on your tax bill, you know that your district doesn't have any. <br />The other thing is that I think that there has been some talk about having a special <br />election to move this process along and I don't think, economically, that makes any <br />sense or in terms of input from the public. I think that this process is going to take a <br />little time. And as a question of information, the input that is going to this body now, is <br />that going to be summarized somewhere? And then there's going to be what, yet <br />another round of meetings to have discussion about that input? <br />HIGASHI: Yes. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.