My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC PH 2000-03-11
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC PH 2000-03-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:06:59 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 8:36:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2000
Meeting date
3/11/2000
Type
MIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HAWAII COUNTY CHARTER COMMISSION <br />Transcript of Public Hearing March 11, 2000 <br />Waimea Civic Center <br />Waimea, Hawaii <br />Members Present: J. Ray, S. Bess, M. Herkes, R. Higashi, S. Irvine, G. Martin (from <br />9:15 a.m.), G. Yoshiyama <br />Absent: E. Alonzo, K. Balog, D. Kurozawa, J. Santangelo <br />And 6 members of the public in attendance. <br />The meeting was called to order at 9:05 a.m. <br />RAY: I'd like to call the 1999-2000 Hawaii County Charter Commission <br />Public Hearing to order. It's Saturday, March 11th. We're at the Waimea Civic Center <br />in Waimea. <br />Attendance. Present at this time, myself John Ray, Roland Higashi, Steve Bess, Marni <br />Herkes, Sue Irvine, and Gary Yoshiyama, and we're expecting a couple of more folks to <br />come in. <br />If nobody objects, prior to Statements from the Public, if anybody's in a hurry and would <br />like to go ahead and make a statement before I go through a brief summary, they're <br />welcome to do so. So would anybody like to do that? Otherwise 1'd like to run through <br />briefly a summary of where we are right now. So is that okay? And on the table there <br />are the short form summaries that we mailed out, as well as more detailed summaries. <br />Initially I want to make it very clear that this is very much a work in process. We're very <br />open to input on what we've suggested, as well as anything else that the public may <br />want to submit. We understand that even though it's kind of late in the process for us, <br />that generally people don't engage things like this until they get a little further along <br />and they have some meat to chew on and whatever. So, that's why we've been <br />pushing to get proposed amendments out as quickly as possible. So, like I say, they're <br />very much in progress and there's lots of things still to be decided, and a lot of votes <br />still to be made, especially in terms of the language and the refining of some of these <br />proposals. So we'll be doing that over the next couple of months before we take our <br />final votes on the proposed amendments, and of course, all that will just be proposed <br />for the election, which will be voted ori by the general public in November. <br />Going through the proposed amendments as listed in the summary, first the non- <br />partisan elections. I think that's pretty clear as far as, not only what that's all about <br />but, how that would work in terms the Primary vs. the General Election if someone wins <br />50% plus one votes, they automatically win in the Primary. Otherwise, the top two vote <br />getters go on to the Special Election. There's also an explanation that deals with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.