MIN CHC PH 2000-03-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Administration and by a number of different departments in terms of how it functions. • So, this is really in reaction to how that functions now within the County. Planning Commission powers. I covered that. That's 6 and 10 together. Qualifications for Heads of Department of Public Work and Department of Water Supply. Right now in the Charter, there is a requirement that both of those positions be filled by a Registered Engineer. I don't know if you remember, last year our Chief Engineer, head of the Public Works Department, retired and the Deputy, who was an engineer, but wasn't a registered engineer, couldn't step up into that position. So, that's what generated a lot of discussion, whether this was necessary or made sense, and in discussing this in regard to Public Works and the Department of Water Supply, the thought was that the job requirement is really more administrative in nature for both of these departments, and there are lots of engineers, there are tons of engineers, in both departments already. So, the suggestion is to eliminate that requirement that requires a registered engineer. Impeachment. Two changes; one that I think is fairly minor is just eliminating one word, and that's a reason for impeachment, the word `maladministration'. Our legal counsel, and others that weighed in on this, just didn't feel like that was a reasonable grounds for impeachment. The more major and controversial change is in the number of signatures required for an impeachment petition. And right now, the number of • signatures required are only 100, and we're suggesting it be raised to 3% of the voters, and that would be 3% of the number of voters registered in the prior election. And that also triggered the necessity to create a procedure to verify signatures, so that's the other part of this section. And that verification language is similar to what's in the Charter now for Initiative and Referendum. The differences are that there would be a one-year time limit on signatures, and we wouldn't allow signatures to carry over from one election term to another. In other words, if impeachment proceedings started in a prior term, it wouldn't carry over to the other. That's one suggested difference, and the other is that it wouldn't require the statement of social security numbers which, in our train of thought, violates Federal law. There's a good explanation of this in the summary. GRAHAM: John, could you tell us just quickly what's the difference between `maladministration' and `malfeasance'? RAY: The difference between maladministration and malfeasance. We do have an attorney here who was Corporation Counsel so he is probably the best person to weigh in on this. BESS: Well, it's just my opinion, but here `malfeasance' is where you have a prescribed duty and you fail to perform that duty. 'Maladministration' is you don't administer very well. It does not deal with a legal duty and then being in violation of that legal duty. It would be a criticism, that instead of it being illegal, you would not be performing as one might like you to perform. Is that clear enough?