Laserfiche WebLink
PRANKE: Some people see that as political because all of the members of <br />the Police Commission have been appointed by the current Mayor and the current - <br />GOODELL: Nominated. <br />PRANKE: Oops, sorry. Exactly. I've fallen into it. Let the cat out of the bag <br />and whip me. Well, I think you get the point and I don't want to take up - I told you at <br />the last meeting I attended I'd give you five. I only gave you four proposals. The one <br />that I really struggled with here was having a standing Charter Review Commission <br />and a Reapportionment Commission. That's going to take a lot of writing and I don't <br />have a secretary so I will work on that and get that kind of a possibility. We shouldn't <br />go through this every ten years. If there's some errors in the Charter that need to be <br />changed, we should be able to do that every couple of years. <br />HERKES: We did it. Look at this. I've got pasted all over. <br />PRANKE: I know. You guys did it, but here you come having to put almost 20 <br />things before the voters, and that's going to be confusing to them. So, I'm in favor of <br />having a standing Charter - And I put in there the process I thought should be used. <br />And apparently you don't disagree with me because number 19, the Cost -of - <br />Government Commission, you're saying would be appointed by the Council, which is <br />the way I put this — one person from each Council district. <br />• HERKES: Actually, Mike Christopher came up with a tremendous - I guess, <br />it's San Diego that has a Civil Jury system. Everybody can throw their names into a <br />hat. They just draw them out, and I really like that as a system for picking something <br />like a Cost -of -Government Commission. I wanted to thank you, especially, for the one <br />that you didn't mention and that was the conduct of employees. <br />PRANKE: Oh, I'm going to get to that. <br />HERKES: Okay, do you want to do it first? I wanted to thank you for that. <br />PRANKE: Yes, I put in there a specific thing that Tying should be a violation of <br />the Code of Ethics. Previously I put something to you. It was kind of off the cuff and <br />said deliberate lying. Lying is deliberate. The definition of lying is to deliberately <br />deceive someone, and the way I put this in here. And I'm sorry for the folks that are <br />here that I don't have more copies of this, but I'm sure you can get it off the web, or <br />don't know. You can get it from her, the things I put in. That should be a violation of <br />the Code of Ethics. Now, you can't just charge somebody with lying and then they're <br />guilty. You've still got to go before the Board of Ethics and prove that it was a lie. <br />Somebody could tell you something that's not true, and it's not a lie if they didn't know <br />that. But recently one member of the County Council has been caught twice on video <br />tape just not being truthful, and it seems to be deceptively not truthful, so that, kind of, <br />21 <br />