My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2009-04-09.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2010
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 2009-04-09.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:47 AM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2009
Meeting date
4/9/2009
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 2009-04-09
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas
COMM. 001 Amendments to Rules - Agenda Item Submissions
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
COMM. 002 Amendments to Rules - Creation of Ad Hoc Committees
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
COMM. 003 Amendments to Rules - Procedure for Proposing Charter Amendments
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Another thing that needs to be changed in this is that we need to increase the number of <br />criteria by which we do redistricting. We only have four criteria in our Charter at this time <br />and two and a half of those criteria were ignored by the past Charter Commission, without <br />making any motions or rulings in public as to what the criteria would be. They had, <br />apparently, a silent agreement on what they were going to use as criteria, and the public was <br />never made aware of it. Although, as the Commission went forward, it became very, very <br />obvious what their agenda was, their unstated agenda was. So, in my legislation I reviewed a <br />lot of legislation throughout the Country and U.S. Supreme Court decisions and wrote in <br />several more criteria by which redistricting should take place and should be considered. That <br />will be submitted as part of my testimony to the Commission. <br />Finally, there was never a written final report by the previous Commission explaining what <br />they did or why. There was only the minutes of meetings and hearings, but no written <br />documentation supporting any Commission decision that was made as a final report. Even <br />though it went to the State Supreme Court, nothing was ever submitted to do this. So we <br />have a lot of problems in this particular section of the Charter that I would like to see <br />corrected. These two lawsuits cost the taxpayers, out of their own pockets, about $100,000. <br />It was all taxpayer money trying to get the County and the County Commission to do the <br />right thing, the honest thing, the legal thing; and both of our lawsuits failed, not for lack of <br />trying and not for lack of presenting the facts in the case. It was a political decision as far as <br />I'm concerned, and the split decision at the State Supreme Court really explained it. Judge <br />Moon was in the minority and said our most basic right as Americans is the right to vote in a <br />fair election, and the basis of fair election is redistricting. So, we need to have this section <br />cleaned up. I hope this Commission will take this into consideration and will take a look at <br />the legislation that I proposed. It did not pass in the Council, and some of the reasons given <br />were the Council thought it should be in the County Code instead of the Charter. But the <br />County Code can be changed by any particular group of Council Members. When you put it <br />in the Charter, it's there until the people change their minds. I'm asking you to make this a <br />Charter amendment and let the people vote on whether they wish to have fair and reasonable <br />redistricting. Thank you very much, and I'm available for questions if you have any. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Thank you, Mrs. Ford. Any questions for Mrs. Ford from any of the <br />Commissioners? No questions. Thank you, Mrs. Ford. Do we have any other statements <br />from any other members of the public? <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Next on our agenda is the approval of the minutes from the last Charter <br />Commission meeting. <br />Mr. Nahale -a moved to approve the minutes of the <br />March 13, 2009 Hawaii County Charter Commission <br />meeting. Seconded by Ms. Jarman. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.