MIN CHC 2009-05-08.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

BRENDA FORD (At this time Councilmember, Brenda Ford came forward to address members of the Commission.) MS. FORD: Yes sir, thank you. Are you covering Articles III and IV today? Is that all? CHR. HAITSUKA: We are covering portions of Article III that we have not covered previously in our previous meeting, all of Article IV and then in our New Business, we are covering Articles V and VI, hopefully. MS. FORD: I would like to testify on a few things, I don't know what your time limits are. In Chapter III, Section 3 -8 (e), there is a section that reads, "A motion to reconsider made at the time any bill fails to pass final reading shall not be voted upon until after 24 hours." I would ask that this be stricken in its entirety. I personally have been part of a vote after 11 hours and 45 minutes when we were all totally exhausted with fatigue and unanimously made the wrong vote because of tiredness. We suspended the rules and went back and voted again and made the correct vote as each person chose to make that vote. This disallows for human error, when human error is just based on a misstatement or exhaustion, or whatever else is going on. There is no reason not to have reconsideration the same day if the Council or the Council Committees choose to do so. So I ask that this section be stricken. Then in Section 3 -11, Emergency Ordinances, the second paragraph, the middle of my page four, hope it's yours. It says, "The affirmative vote of all council members present or by two - thirds of the entire membership shall be necessary for adoption of such ordinances." Now this has to do with emergency ordinances. I understand what this is trying to say, but it's very clumsily worded. It's trying to say that if we are in an emergency situation, and perhaps all nine council members cannot be present because of the emergency, then whoever can get together requires a unanimous vote. But, if we can get a quorum, a regular quorum, then it requires - - -and in this case it would require a super quorum of six people; if we can get at least six people then they can vote. I understand what it is trying to say, but it is not worded very well, and I hope you can clean up this language to express it more clearly. Farther down, two paragraphs down, it starts out "Every emergency ordinance, including any amendments made after adoption, shall automatically stand repealed as of the sixty -first day..." I would like to ask that you do some investigation on this. It is my opinion that 61 days maybe too short a period of time. We're still dealing with issues two years later. I realize that the 61 days has to do with an immediate emergency to life, property or health, but sometimes 61 days just doesn't do it when we sit out here in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and we have to rely on other islands and other states on the mainland. I would ask you to investigate 61 days, if that is sufficient. Of course, Section 3 -17 which is titled County Reapportionment Commission. I've sent a voluminous amount of information to you, and I am prepared to discuss that or answer questions, whatever you would like as you go through it. 5