MIN CHC 2009-10-09.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

selecting members is, the name of the contact person for the board or commission, and other relevant information concerning the board or commission. It also states the authority and powers of the commission. Now, for instance, I thought - -and I wanted to thank you too - -it was very helpful to be coming before the Charter Commission and having just a short biography of who I was addressing. So, I appreciate that you were willing to put that on your website, short bios for each of you. I think that's important for community members to be able to know who they're talking to. So, I also included that information in this Charter Amendment. I'm moving on to Vacancy in Office. If you are going to be considering four years in office, a very stout and very easy to follow to recall Charter amendment would be important to balance a four -year term. That way, if someone gets in to the Council office, the Mayor's office, or the Prosecuting Attorney -- because those are the only three offices that are elected in our County - -and they are not doing their job, or something happens or whatever, then you are going to want to balance a four -year term with an easier recall method. Well after we went through that onerous process of how is the vacancy filled. When I looked at that process, if there is a vacancy in a council office, the ruling majority will vote to replace the council member. Now, I don't know that that would serve the interests of the island well, because that would only support the majority. If a vacancy occurs in the Mayor's office, right now the Managing Director takes over, and that's not someone who ran for office. And that may not be someone who has leadership capabilities. If a vacancy occurs in the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, his appointee, the first deputy, takes over. That person may not be the best for a leadership position. So, in my proposal, this Charter Amendment says, "The person who received the next highest number of votes in the last general election (or in the primary election if the official won in the primary election) shall be appointed to serve the remainder of that term." Now, Barbara Lively had a really good point. If that person only got 10% of the vote, I don't know if that is a real citizens' mandate. I also had several comments from other people about that and that it wasn't the best way to go. As I rethink that, maybe that isn't the best way to go. So, after six months in office, if there are more than six months left in office, maybe it should go back to the people and also in a special election by mail. If it's less than six months, the County Council could appoint someone to serve out the term. So that's what I'm proposing on that. On the last one, which is Communication 51, amending or revising the Charter - -as I was reading that one - -it becomes very difficult. The reason I know it becomes difficult is because when we did the 2% for Open Space as an amendment, we had a very, very difficult time as a citizens' group understanding the process by which the ordinance could be amended. Also, dealing with the County as to whether we could collect more signatures, when to get in the petitions, the signature verification process, whether a signature was viable. As a matter of fact, one of the big issues we had was the most signatures that were deleted or found to be invalid were found because the date was incorrect. People left off the year, '06. That was kind of "nit- picky" because it started in April and ended in July. It wasn't like it ran from year to year. So that was one of the largest reasons why people's signatures were kicked off 16