MIN CHC 2009-10-09.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

negating the House Bill. I also think that if we are going to move to implementing four -year terms, that the ballot question should be phrased in such a way that people understand that they cannot then make Charter amendments, or they cannot bring initiatives forward for four years. I also wanted to comment on Communication 45. I believe that is a communication that has been proposed by Debbie Hecht. I support the idea of moving the 2% ordinance into the Charter. I believe that we owe it to the voters who voted for it to move it into a situation where it would guarantee deposits and it would protect the fund itself, and the purpose of the fund. So, I do like that idea, and also I think the ballot question should also be easily understandable. The last one is that I support Communication 46, also proposed by Ms. Hecht, giving the public a say in filling Council vacancies. If a vacancy comes up on the County Council, right now, I think it is up to the Chair, or the rest of the Council members to go ahead and try to fill that vacancy, but I can see a benefit in letting the public have a say in that process. Debbie, I believe, has proposed to let the second highest placing vote earner take the office. I think that's a good idea, but I would just like to add a caveat, that that second place person should have gotten at least 25% of the total votes cast. That second place person isn't just the only other person that there was. I don't think that would truly represent the people, unless they had at least 25% of the overall votes cast. I think that's it. Thank you very much. CHR. HAITSUKA: Are there any questions for Ms. Lively? Thank you very much. Next we have Bett Bidleman. Good afternoon, Ms. Bidleman. BETT BIDLEMAN (At this time Bett Bidleman came forward to address members of the Charter Commission.) MS. BIDLEMAN: Aloha. I thought that actually Rob was going to speak first and I was going to follow up on his testimony, so I guess I'm going to just start talking about Communication 48, which came from Friends of Puna's Future. This testimony was brought to your attention on including Community Development Plans (CDP's) and their Action Committees in the County Charter, by Margaret Wille. She brought this up first. When I was reading her testimony, actually I was able to watch it, because it was the one time we had a video recording and it was on the internet. I followed up by reading the written testimony. One of you, I believe it was Commissioner Fuertes, asked about what the Charter could do, what the Commissioners could do, that would put teeth into the CDP's. Our written testimony is really about some of the things that we would like to see if you decide to put this on the ballot. We would want to see the language fall under the General Plan, so it is an integral part of planning for our County. We would like it to state clearly that every ten years, there will be public meetings every ten years to address it; and until that CDP is replaced by another one that CDP will remain in place. We are really concerned about the amount of time - -in the Puna district, we were the first group that started this process, and we were the ones that got our ordinance passed first, and here we are, it's over a year, and we still don't have our Action Committee. So, to us, these delays are important to change. We 0