Laserfiche WebLink
CHR. HAITSUKA: Are there any questions for Ms. Bidleman? Thank you Ms. Bidleman. <br />Next we have Ms. Joyce Folena. Good afternoon, Ms. Folena. <br />JOYCE FOLENA <br />(At this time Joyce Folena came forward to address members of the Charter Commission.) <br />MS. FOLENA: Good afternoon, sir. The first matter that I would like to talk about is that I <br />strongly oppose changing the terms of the County Council members back to four years. We <br />passed the two -year terms for a very good reason. I'm not going to mince words. We passed <br />the two -year term limits, and did away with the four -year term limits in order to dissuade the <br />perception and the reality of corruption, and the old term that power corrupts, and absolute <br />power corrupts absolutely. When you have two terms, in my opinion sirs and madams, you <br />definitely do away with a lot of the corruptive in roads into our politics and our business in <br />the County of Hawaii. On the good side, you also increase the viability of worthy council <br />members to retain their seats, and you give the public a chance to voice their opinions every <br />two years, instead of every four years. Four years is a darn long time for a representative to <br />be set in stone. Two years is the acceptable term limit. Thanks. <br />Referring to the Puna CDP, and all Community Development Plans, we definitely - -we <br />meaning folks I've talked to, and myself- -want to see a law, something in the County Charter <br />saying there have to be Action Committees connected to all the CDP's within one year of the <br />CDP being completed. Our Puna Community Development Plan has been sitting on the desk <br />now for too darn long. All the work that went into it - -I've been involved in it for maybe 12 <br />or 14 years - -way back, when people were talking about doing this, before it actually birthed <br />itself, before the people birthed it. So, this is a long, long process, sitting in people's rooms, <br />sitting in their houses, talking it over, figuring out what we need, how do we get it, how do <br />we control wholesale development in our island, how do we control turn over pancake land <br />for profit, how do we protect our environment, how do we protect ourselves, how do we <br />protect our descendents? There are, as you know, unscrupulous money- making machines in <br />our world, nationally and internationally, that don't give a rip about, can we breathe the air in <br />50 years; can we breathe the air in ten years. They care about money. One year after these <br />Community Development Plans are completed, we need to have it mandated by law that we <br />have an Action Committee; a working Action Committee. We are asking, why were 36 <br />people trashed out of the original list, and why is that plan sitting in Mr. Kenoi's office in an <br />unusable position. We haven't gotten any answers yet. Thanks. <br />Everything that Margaret Wille had to say, from an attorney's standpoint, and I'm not an <br />attorney. I'm not saying that, but because she is an attorney, I trust what she has to say. And <br />what she has to say makes a lot of sense to me. Rather than go on and on and on about it, I <br />augment Margaret Wille's testimony, thank you, in all aspects. I want to talk something <br />about redistricting and reapportionment. I understand the difference between the words <br />redistricting and reapportionment. As far as I'm concerned, even being a lay person, I'm <br />going to say openly that I feel that what happened nearly ten years ago was illegal concerning <br />the redistricting of the County of Hawaii. We have a Reapportionment committee; we don't <br />have a Redistricting committee. We need to have that committee changed from <br />0 <br />