Laserfiche WebLink
MR. UNGER: I would support changing it to "may." <br />Ms. Jarman moved to remove all the deleted <br />language and change "shall" to "may" in <br />Section (g). Seconded by Mr. Nahale -a and <br />carried by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Fuertes, Jarman, <br />Kawauchi, Kealoha, Nahale -a, <br />Shumway, Unger and Chair Haitsuka. <br />Noes: Commissioner Kaulukukui. <br />Absent: Commissioners Honma and Osborne. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: We have amended CA -38. Is there any further discussion on CA -38? <br />Mr. Nahale -a. <br />MR. NAHALE -A: I would like to propose another amendment. What I would like to do <br />is instead of making the compensation rate based on their regular employment, to set it <br />like at two times minimum wage or something like that, so that it addresses some of the <br />cost concerns that corporation counsel has. Also, I think that someone who is serving <br />who is a doctor or an attorney shouldn't necessarily get more than the person sitting next <br />to them who is maybe a laborer or something. I think if we are going to compensate <br />folks on a board or commission, it should be equitable across the board. So I'm going to <br />propose to amend, but I'd like to defer at this time, until I can work out some language. <br />MS. JARMAN: May I address Mr. Nahale -a? Maybe you could change the last, instead <br />of exceeding five times, to exceeding whatever time you want of the state minimum <br />wage. Right now it says whatever the rate of pay is, as long as it is not more than five <br />times. If the five times is more than you would like, you could decide on how many <br />times of the state minimum wage you would be more comfortable with. And that would <br />be a fairly easy amendment. <br />MR. NAHALE -A: Thank you, I like that. <br />Mr. Nahale -a moved to amend CA -38 by <br />changing from "five times" to "two times" <br />the state minimum wage. Seconded by <br />Mr. Shumway. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Is there any discussion? <br />MR. UNGER: I have another question about section (f). Can we discuss that now, or is <br />that a separate motion? <br />26 <br />