Laserfiche WebLink
DEBBIE HECHT <br />(At this time Debbie Hecht came forward to address members of the Charter Commission.) <br />MS. HECHT: Aloha Commissioners. My name is Debbie Hecht. I worked with Sue <br />Dursin and Marian Wilkins for a year and a half on initiative and referendum; that was <br />approved by voters in 2008. The amendment you have before you, CA -16, uses that <br />language and adapts it to amending the Charter, so we all ask you to pass that. <br />On CA -15, the 2% land fund, I woke up this morning thinking about the Hamakua lands, <br />and the sale of those lands by the County. Then I wondered, how are we to prevent any <br />of the property purchased by the 2% land fund from being sold, traded, transferred, or <br />whatever. So, I researched it this morning, and in other places in the Country they <br />include a clause that runs with the land that says something to the effect that, "This land <br />was purchased with public funds and shall be held in public trust for the use by all the <br />people of Hawaii county. It shall never be sold, traded, transferred, or mortgaged." I <br />think that is real important to include with these lands because it is our tax money that is <br />buying it. I think it's also really important to include in the legislation, in the Charter <br />amendment, that the highest and best uses for matching funds. Also, the use of this <br />money, like the land fund versus police and fire; this is not an either /or proposition. At <br />hearings to suspend the 2% fund last year, at the last reading, union people showed up in <br />tears saying take the 2 %, not our jobs. There are plenty of ways to solve the budget <br />crisis, and 2 million dollars here is not going to make a huge difference. The County's <br />major job is to protect citizens' health and welfare, and Cory Harden is right; open space <br />doesn't require expensive services like development. <br />We know the people voted one more time for the 2 %, and I'm very worried that they are <br />going to be very confused about 1 %, and then we can have the ordinance up to 2 %. I'm <br />worried it wouldn't pass; and I'm also worried if it doesn't pass, the administration will <br />turn around and say, "See, they never wanted it, they don't care about open space." I <br />have been hearing things from people on the street like, "1 %, that's only 2 million, what <br />are we going to buy with that ?" "That won't buy anything, why vote for that ?" "How <br />come they no listen ?" "Why should I vote, they don't listen ?" Then, the thing that <br />thoroughly depressed me was one of my kids on the Kealakehe tennis team asked me <br />what I did for work; I said that for the last four years I have been working on setting aside <br />2% of property taxes to purchase open space. We asked the County to approve it through <br />the Council twice, and they said, "No." We collected 10,000 signatures and over 6,000 <br />of them were invalidated. We got it on the ballot, and then they deleted the purpose <br />clause. Then we got five seats to say they will reinstate the purpose clause if those <br />people were elected, and we knew we were good to go. And I'm telling this to a teenage <br />girl, no less, and I said the 63% of the people voted for it, and then the Council suspended <br />it for two years. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Ms. Hecht, your time is up. <br />7 <br />