Laserfiche WebLink
CHR. HAITSUKA: Let's go to Communication 256.4 with respect to the proposed summary <br />language for CA -5. We have a proposed summary that was drafted by the League of Women <br />Voters. Do I have a motion to adopt this language? <br />Ms. Jarman moved to approve the Education <br />Committee's proposed summary language <br />for CA -5 as stated in Communication 256.4 <br />Seconded by Mr. Shumway and carried by the <br />following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Jarman, Kaulukukui, <br />Kealoha, Nahale -a, Osborne, Shumway, <br />Unger and Chair Haitsuka. <br />Noes: None. <br />Absent: Commissioners Fuertes, Honma, and <br />Kawauchi. <br />CA -6 RELATING TO REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS SERVING UNDER COMMISSIONS <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Let's go back to Communication 258. Do I have a motion to adopt the <br />proposed ballot language for CA -6? <br />Mr. Shumway moved to adopt the proposed <br />ballot language for CA -6 as stated in <br />Communication 258. Seconded by <br />Ms. Osborne. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: I just noticed something. We might be changing the name of the head <br />of the department of water supply. So, I guess at some point in time they will have to go <br />back and amend this provision to change the name, if the voters approve CA -1. That is just <br />an observation. We have it identified as the "manager" of the department of water supply, <br />and CA -1 proposes to change that title to the "manager chief engineer." I don't think this is <br />something that can be addressed until CA -1 is adopted. <br />Is there any further discussion? <br />20 <br />