My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2009-09-26 PH-Pahala.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2010
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearings
>
MIN CHC 2009-09-26 PH-Pahala.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2018 3:03:04 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:21:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2009
Meeting date
9/26/2009
Type
MIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. ENRIQUES: Thank you very much for coming out here, and for volunteering for this <br />stuff. Thank you. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Next we have Mr. Bradley Westervelt. <br />BRADLEY WESTERVELT <br />(At this time Bradley Westervelt came forward to address members of the Charter Commission.) <br />MR. WESTERVELT: Good morning. I wasn't planning on speaking but after hearing Guy <br />speak, I thought I would come up here and thank you for the work you are doing, I like what <br />I have read here. I just reviewed the nine amendments, and I have a couple of comments on <br />number eight. But, first I want to say I am particularly pleased with number seven. This is a <br />good progressive idea that we should base recall petitions on the number of voters that <br />actually participate in our elections. That is a more fair way than counting the number of <br />potential voters. Let's actually deal with things on the terms of the number of active voters. <br />So, thank you for that. Number eight has me a bit confused. I don't actually know the <br />purpose of this, and I know I'm not here to ask you questions about that, so I'm just going to <br />comment. Removing the requirement that claims against the County be filed with the <br />County Clerk and instead be filed with the Corporation Counsel, I can understand the <br />efficiency in that because everything has to go to Corporation Counsel anyways; but there are <br />a couple of related issues that have me concerned. This relates directly to the subject of <br />transparency that was being discussed a moment ago. If someone from the public comes <br />forward with a complaint against the County, this amendment would put the record - keeping <br />on this out of the public eye, it would seem. If the complaint goes straight to Corporation <br />Counsel, it could potentially die there, and never be viewed by the public. It goes on to say <br />that the requirement for the annual report must be filed with the office of the Mayor instead <br />of the County Clerk. Again, that seems to be odd, why would we want to put record - keeping <br />anywhere but the County Clerk's office? The County Clerk is supposed to be the repository <br />of all public records. If someone brings forth a complaint or a lawsuit, I would think the <br />public would think to look there first, as opposed to going to Corporation Counsel or the <br />office of the Mayor. So, I question the wisdom of this approach, and I'm curious as to what <br />inspired this suggested change, but I'll research that at a later time. That's all, are there any <br />questions? <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Are there any questions? <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Mr. Enriques. <br />MR. ENRIQUES: I just wanted to make a comment just to remind you, if and when you <br />need my help to move this four -year thing, I'd be happy to be part of the education process. <br />Thank you. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Thank you very much. There doesn't appear to be any other testifiers, <br />and we will close this meeting at 9:42 a.m. Thank you. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.