My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1989-02-15
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1989-02-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:51 AM
Creation date
4/9/2018 10:07:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1989
Meeting date
2/15/1989
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1989-02-15
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1990\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11/1 <br /> 4. Registered-voter approach <br /> 5. Residency count less controversial <br /> 6. Cushnie: Bill 3164 <br /> Bethea: No Big Isle impact <br /> 7. Redraw district lines <br /> 8. Involves non-conformance of geographical <br /> area <br /> 9. Allow 10% deviation 2. Recommends de-politicizing <br /> 10. District living-in requirements reapportionment body <br /> 11. Consider discriminatory practices <br /> II. PREVIOUS HAWAII CONSTITUTION <br /> A. Stated principals <br /> 1. No dramatic geographical splits in <br /> districts <br /> 2. Emphasized keeping islands together <br /> III. HAWAII COUNTY CHARTER <br /> A. Initiative, recall, referendum <br /> • 1. Percentage of signatures necessary varies 3. Consider standardizing <br /> a) 15% initiative percentages; 10% is norm <br /> b) 25% recall <br /> 1) Omanaha: purpose not to allow a <br /> recall easily <br /> 2) People can vote against recall <br /> election itself <br /> 3) Cushnie: Section 11.5-6; <br /> certification standards <br /> c) 20% referendum (proposing amendments <br /> to Charter) <br /> 2. Oahu retains all three at 10% <br /> B. Initiative on limited topics was deleted 4. Set some initiative <br /> (Section 11.2) topic limits <br /> C. Indirect initiative (only gets put on ballot 5. Supports indirect <br /> if Council decides not to adopt) initiative <br /> D. Ballot signatures <br /> 1. Should signatures be good indefinitely? 6. Need to limit number of <br /> a) Cushnie: time limitation set by Clerk years to collect signatures <br /> 1110 123 . 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.