Laserfiche WebLink
'y <br /> CHRISTOPHER J. I. lJ EN HILO LAGOON CENTRE,SUITE 108 <br /> 101 AUPUNI STREET <br /> HILO,HAWAII 96720 <br /> ATTORNEY AT LAW TEL.(808)935-4429 <br /> November 27, 1989 <br /> Hawaii County Charter Commission <br /> 101 Aupuni Street <br /> Hilo Lagoon Centre, Suite 235 <br /> Hilo, Hawaii 96720 <br /> Re: Political Activities of Police Officers <br /> Dear Charter Commission Members: <br /> I was asked to describe the limits which could be placed on <br /> the political activities of police officers. In brief, the <br /> County Charter could create any limits which do not contradict <br /> the political rights established by H.R.S. §76-91. Permissible <br /> limitations would include a prohibition against police officers <br /> running for or holding elective office and prohibitions against <br /> political activities while in uniform or during work hours. <br /> State law (H.R.S. §76-91) gives all civil servants, including <br /> police officers, the right to engage in most other kinds of <br /> political activities. <br /> The remainder of this letter gives the legal background for <br /> the brief answer contained in the preceding paragraph. Two <br /> points to keep in mind: (1) I will be describing the legal <br /> parameters. The wisdom of imposing such limits is the Charter <br /> Commission's decision. (2) , While I will be referring primarily <br /> to police officers, the legal issues are the same for all civil <br /> servants. <br /> It is established as a 'matter of federal constitutional law <br /> that the government may prohibit employees from soliciting or <br /> receiving campaign contributions, belonging to party committees, <br /> becoming candidates for partisan office, or taking part in <br /> political campaigns in any way. The United States Supreme Court <br /> has decided several times, most recently in 1973, that <br /> substantial limitations may be placed on the political activities <br /> of government employees, including off-duty activities, without <br /> violating the U.S. Constitution. The government's interest in <br /> having a work force that is untainted by partisan politics <br /> outweighs the employee's normal rights under the First Amendment. <br /> United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75 (1947) ; State of <br /> Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service, 330 U.S. 127 (1947) ; <br /> United States Civil Service Commission v. National Association of <br /> Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548 (1973) ; Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 <br /> U.S. 601 (1973) . <br /> 695 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> (4 pages) <br />