My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1990-06-01
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1990-06-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 8:41:49 AM
Creation date
4/10/2018 8:41:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1990
Meeting date
6/1/1990
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1990-06-01
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1990\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• separate ballot questions: (1) limitation on fiscal and <br /> tax matters; (2) limitation on zoning and planning; and <br /> (3) other procedural changes. Motion was seconded by <br /> L'Orange. All were in favor except Cushnie, and the <br /> motion was carried. <br /> (Mr. Nishikawa left. ) <br /> Motion No. 2 : Poppe moved to allow signatures on <br /> initiative petitions to be valid if obtained within 2 1/2 <br /> years of the general election. All were in favor and the <br /> motion carried. <br /> Motion No. 3 : Greenwell moved for adoption of all <br /> language contained in Attachment "A" of Yuen's May 23 , <br /> 1990 letter (except for the deadlines covered in the <br /> previous motion) . Poppe seconded. All were in favor and <br /> the motion was carried. <br /> A discussion followed on ballot language for initiative <br /> and referendum and the proposal for a committee to draft <br /> the ballot language. Counsel was requested to review the <br /> California statute concerning initiative and referendum. <br /> VI. BOARD OF ETHICS <br /> 411 After discussion of the County Council proposal on the <br /> Board of Ethics, this item was deferred to the next <br /> meeting. <br /> Cushnie questioned whether the provision for "staggered <br /> terms" in Attachment "D" of Yuen's May 23 , 1990 letter <br /> referred only to the four new members of the board of <br /> ethics. Yuen replied that this was the intent. <br /> L'Orange requested that the issue of changing all present <br /> nine-member boards to conform to single-member council <br /> districts be placed on the agenda for the next meeting. <br /> VII. COUNCIL CONTRACTS <br /> Motion No. 4 : L'Orange moved not to recommend expanding <br /> the Council's power to enter into contracts. Greenwell <br /> seconded. All were in favor of the motion and the motion <br /> carried. <br /> L'Orange suggested that a letter be sent to Councilwoman <br /> Hale responding to her letter of March 15, 1990. <br /> • <br /> -2- <br /> 10-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.