My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1990-06-22
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1990-06-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 8:46:22 AM
Creation date
4/10/2018 8:45:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1990
Meeting date
6/22/1990
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1990-06-22
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1990\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. - • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> December 27, 1989 <br /> MEMO TO: Gore Hokama, Council Chairman <br /> 1' R 0 X: Daryl T. Tamamoto, County Clerk f.S? • <br /> SUBJECT: VOTING INPORMATION ON 1988 CHARTER AMENDMENTS <br /> The attached is provided for your information and use during <br /> the Council 's deliberations on proposed Charter amendments for <br /> the 1990 elections. <br /> Because only a majority of votes cast is required to approve <br /> a Charter amendment, all nine Charter amendments in the. 1988 <br /> General Election were approved. It is interesting to note that • <br /> had the requirement been a majority of the voter turnout, only <br /> three of the' nine amendments would have been approved. If the <br /> requirement was a majority of registered voters, none of the <br /> amendments would have been approved. <br /> The number of blank votes on the Charter amendments ranged <br /> from a low of 5,624 blank votes to a high of 8,909 blank votes. <br /> On two of the Charter amendments,• the total number of blank <br /> votes actually exceeded the total no votes. . Based on our <br /> . observations and comments received, the reasons for • the <br /> significant number of blank votes were primarily twofold. • <br /> The first reason is that voters did not understand the <br /> ballot questions. Since any proposed amendment must be phrased <br /> in the form of a - question to require a "yes" or mno" response <br /> from the voter, it is often difficult to convey the intent or <br /> meaning of the proposed amendment. Although we did provide a <br /> handout that included the intent or purpose of the proposed <br /> . amendments, we were unable to provide reasons for the proposed <br /> amendments- or their justifications, because none were available. <br /> The second-- reason for the number of blank votes was <br /> apparently due- to the number of questions on the ballots. For <br /> every regular voter in Maui County, five. ballots were issued and <br /> a sixth ballot was issued- to ORA voters. Of those ballots, <br /> three contained a total of 16 questions, 7 on proposed <br /> amendments to the State Constitution and 9 on proposed <br /> amendments . to the- County Charter. Voters were either <br /> overwhelmed by the number of questions to vote on or simply did <br /> • <br /> .- cjli, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.