Laserfiche WebLink
. . <br /> . • <br /> ..., . <br /> . . • . . <br /> . . . . <br /> . • . .. , <br /> , . <br /> . . <br /> • . I . 1. . - . . • • • <br /> • . <br /> • . . . <br /> . • - • - <br /> . . . . • <br /> , . <br /> . . <br /> . • II <br /> . . . <br /> . • . <br /> . . <br /> . • . <br /> . . , <br /> • . • <br />, - <br /> .:. ' <br /> 4 <br /> . .. <br /> SUPREME i(((.....lllllllltift:h(e)(741•IiirAt W A I 1-6 .' 1 <br /> . . <br /> . . . <br /> director of public works and the other shall be the planning 4 <br /> . <br /> .1., - ..,: <br /> • - - director of the County of Maui. This section, therefore, con- <br /> flicts • . : I <br /> • i . <br /> . • I - with HRS § 54-12. %%hich provides that there shall be. • ' • • <br /> 4 1 ' • seven voting members. five of whom shall be appointed by the <br /> . . mayor with the approval of the Maui Council, one of whom • <br /> , . • '- shall be the chief engineer of the county and one of whom • <br /> i l • <br /> i I , shall be the state district engineer of the state department of • - ; <br /> ' <br /> transportation. <br /> n . . <br /> - i <br /> • 4. Section 8-11.4 of the revised charter sets forth a <br /> . , 1 • <br /> minimum qualification for appointment as director of the <br /> . e <br /> i <br /> department of water supply which differs from FIRS § 54-14. <br /> • ! , !, <br /> . 1 . Under the charter's requirement, before one can qualify as a • : .. 1 <br /> • director of the department of water supply,he must have had 1 <br /> • ;- i• st <br /> • • • five years training and experience in"a responsible adminis- i <br /> . . <br /> . <br /> trative capacity, either in public service or private business, <br /> 1 <br /> . . or both. In contrast HRS § 54-14, requires that the director <br /> ! i <br /> . i <br /> • shall be an engineerduly registered under FIRS chapter 464. . <br /> . , • i <br /> . • . • Therefore, the charter section, to this extent, conflicts with <br /> . . . i <br /> HRS § 54-14. . • . 1 <br /> .. t <br /> . . <br /> . . . 5. Section 8-12.2 of the revised charter provides for a <br /> police commission of seven members, with no restriction as. .. . : <br /> : . to who may serve on the commission. This section is in <br /> conflict with FIRS § 52-1. which restricts the police commis- <br /> sion • <br /> . . • <br /> • .- in each county to five members, no more than three of . . <br /> , J <br /> • whom shall belong to the same political party-at the time of <br /> • appointment. . . <br /> . : <br /> . • 6. Section 8-13.3 of the revises charter provides that <br /> . ' ... , <br /> — <br /> "The liquor control adjudication board shall hear and deter- <br /> • mine all complaints regarding violations of the liquor control <br /> - . laws of the State, or complaints regarding violations of rules <br /> • i <br /> and regulations established by the liquor control commis- . <br /> . . i sion," and the liquor control adjudication board is authorized . 1 1 <br /> 1 <br /> . <br /> to "impose such fines or punishment as may be provided by <br /> law upon the conviction thereof." It is claimed by appellants • <br /> . . <br /> . • <br /> . • . that this section is in conflict with FIRS§ 281-17(Supp. 1975).. 1 <br /> which places this function in the liquor control commission. • <br /> 7. Section 8-13.4 of the revised charter provides that the • • . I <br /> .: <br /> • ' director of the department of liquor control shall have had a • . I <br /> . . <br /> - . . . <br />, . . . . <br /> • <br /> .. , . . . <br /> 1 . . <br /> .. . <br /> • <br /> • <br /> . <br /> . .• . • <br /> . .• <br /> . . <br /> . • . <br /> . • <br /> . . <br /> - 1 • , . . ' ' . <br /> . . • <br /> • <br /> . . . <br /> . . <br /> . . . . <br /> . . . . <br /> • ; .... <br /> . . • . . . <br /> . • . . . <br /> • <br /> . . • <br /> . . <br /> • <br />