Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> A <br /> WEST HAWAII PROPOSAL FOR INTERIM - 9 from Representative Districts <br /> District Council Ro?pailation/ % Voters/ .r <br /> Members Member Average Member Average <br /> 1) Kau-Puna- 2 8750 ' +1% . . 4138 -6% <br /> S.Hilo <br /> 2) S,Hilo 3 10000 +16% 5083 +15% <br /> '3) S.Hilo;N.Hilo 2 . 7350 • . —15% 3536 • —20% <br /> Hamakua <br /> N.Kohala <br /> 4) S.Kohala 2 7800 . -10% 4581 +4% <br /> N.Kona • <br /> S.Kona: <br /> Desired average 8644 4418 <br /> RANGE OF PROPOSALS SUMMARY • <br /> Proposal Based on Based on <br /> Population Voters <br /> om isi�n <br /> plus +56% t® -32% +61% t® -33% <br /> • <br /> West Hawaii • <br /> Permanent +44 to -6% +10%' to —5% <br /> 9 direct <br /> West Hawaii <br /> Interim +16 to —15% +15% to —20% <br /> 9 direct <br /> It is apparent that the most fair,equitable method is the direct <br /> election from equal districts (the West Hawaii permanent <br /> proposal) with the West Hawaiii Interim Proposal much <br /> more fair than the Commission 5 plus 2 proposal. <br /> -3- <br />