My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-02-06
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-02-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:08:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
2/6/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-02-06
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. OMONOKA: Can I suggest that we allow <br /> Mr. Fuke to come back andshould we have any questions <br /> regarding his proposals then we can call the different <br /> departments if we so desire, rather than have them come in. <br /> Would this approach be much better? We 've heard them once <br /> and Mr. Fuke isn 't quite prepared so he' ll be making a pre-' <br /> pared presentation the next go round. Once we hear him out <br /> then should we have any question regarding the other agencies <br /> that he touches upon we ask them to come back if we have any <br /> questions. Would that be a better way to go? <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Mr. Chairman, I make the <br /> suggestion that because it appeared that, I don 't know who <br /> made the comment why not have the other departments come <br /> in. But I don ' t picture it as being a free for all by any <br /> use of the word. I think it could be done diplomatically <br /> but if the Chair so wishes, that ' s fine, but take into <br /> consideration there are not too many more dates available <br /> after that. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: May I make a suggestion that <br /> since Mr. Fuke will plan to have his presentation in <br /> writing and I believe that you will have that presentation <br /> given to each of the departments? Is that my understanding? <br /> MR. FUKE: I will make my testimony avail- <br /> able to all of the county agencies. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: So if that is the case then I <br /> was thinking maybe if the Public Works or R & D desire to <br /> give or add to or make comments concerning Mr. Fuke 's presen- <br /> tation, I suppose if they could have time to. .they need not <br /> be present but if they wish to, maybe we should give them <br /> the opportunity on the same day that Mr. Fuke's comesin. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Then we will allow Mr. Fuke <br /> March 6 to present his testimony again. Is. that agreeable <br /> to all of you? March 6 to put him on the Agenda? <br /> MR. CADINHA: Mr. Chairman, could we possibly <br /> invite the mayor back on that day? I 've got some questions. <br /> I 'm a little vague on, specifically, the fiscal matters. And <br /> I sense a problem with this water thing. Functionally, I 'd <br /> like to know what it is and the only way to find out is to <br /> ask. I 'd like to have him come back. This day, if we have time. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Then you would like to <br /> have the mayor put. . . . <br /> MR. CADINHA: Whatever the schedule allows. <br /> Specifically the mayor. Akira, is that a problem? <br /> MR. OMONOKA: If you look at your schedule <br /> from May 1 the agenda calls for a commencing of drafting <br /> revisions to the Charter. At this point in time, if we get <br /> stuck with any agency, we can ask them back. <br /> -32- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.