My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-02-13
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-02-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
2/13/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-02-13
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. TRULSON: If he would ,advise us what his <br /> recommendations are as referred to the language of the <br /> Charter instead of the code. <br /> MS. GARCIA: Yes , this is all dealing with <br /> the code. Now, Number 2, County Council ' s acceptance of <br /> County Clerk ' s recommendation to delete the words "without <br /> proper consent" at the °end of the sentence in Section 7A. <br /> That is the code, not the Charter. <br /> Number 3, Councilwoman Lai ' s recommendations. <br /> Were you provided with any of the materials from Council- <br /> woman Lai in her presentation to the Council on February 1? <br /> If you will notice Section 14-3. Disclosure <br /> of Interest. What she is talking about when she refers to <br /> Section 6 and Section 6A are those sections in the Hawaii <br /> County Code which are the identical , or almost the identical, <br /> language of Section 14-3( a) (b) in your Charter. <br /> The Charter states, in subsection ( a) "It shall <br /> be incumbent upon all employees or officers of the county to: <br /> ( a) Make full disclosure in writing to his appointing <br /> authority or to the council in the case of an elective <br /> officer, the possession or acquisition of any interests , <br /> financial or otherwise as might reasonably tend to create a <br /> conflict with the public interest. " And then the language <br /> continues, of course. <br /> Now, in the code, the language is almost <br /> identical except that it provides that there shall be a <br /> certain period of time within which the employee or officer <br /> of the county shall make this disclosure. And as it is <br /> written in the code, presently, it implies that upon your <br /> election or appointment within 20 days of your election or <br /> appointment as an employee or officer of the county, you <br /> must make this disclosure pursuant to the Code of Ethics. <br /> But what was happening is that people were being elected <br /> two months before they actually took office. Under that <br /> language it says, "within 20 days of your election or <br /> appointment as an employee or an officer of the county". <br /> Now, Ms. Lai , for example, was elected let ' s <br /> say, October 15 but she didn ' t take office, we' ll say, until <br /> January 1. I don ' t remember the exact dates. But to <br /> explain this to you, if she is elected on October 15 . She <br /> doesn ' t have to go into a runoff in the primary. She' s <br /> elected November 15 and you have almost two months that pass <br /> before she actually assumes her responsibilities as a <br /> Councilwoman. And, yet, the code says that'Awithin 20 days <br /> of your election as an officer, or your appointment as an <br /> employee of the county, you must make this disclosure. <br /> Well , this is not so bad for employees , but <br /> for elected officers , it is extremely difficult because <br /> they haven 't even assumed office yet and they are. . .they <br /> -10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.