My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-03-06
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-03-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:16:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
3/6/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-03-06
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the broader economic policy areas like in tourism or agri- <br /> culture, the planning function should be handled by the <br /> Planning Department. The actual implementation of those <br /> functions should be handled by another agency. <br /> There is kind of like a strange mix. Take, <br /> for example, the state passed a law requiring the counties <br /> to develop Via:=+program requiring parks for all of the sub- <br /> divisions within the island. It ' s the park's dedication <br /> requirement. The state law says that county planning, you <br /> guys have got to be responsible because you guys handle the <br /> subdivision. But on the other hand, who is the one who is <br /> a little bit more knowledgable in figuring out where the <br /> parks should be; what the park ' s ratio should be within an <br /> area. And that logical):y falls within the Parks and Rec- <br /> reation Department. Not because it involves land, then it <br /> is the Planning to be handling. <br /> I feel that what we should be doing as the <br /> Planning Department is making sure that all of these diff- <br /> erent kinds of concerns; the water; the sewer; the roadway <br /> system or the park facilities are all over there but letting <br /> the other guys doing it and we pulling it all together. So, <br /> in a sense, we become the major coordinators but we don ' t <br /> actually become and assume the functions of implementation <br /> that is currently assigned to the different agencies ; the <br /> Parks ; the Public Works ; the Research and Development ; and <br /> also the Water. <br /> MR. SENSANO: Don ' t you think , Mr. Fuke, <br /> that if these different departments were under one head there <br /> would be less tendency to build empires of their own regard- <br /> less of the general welfare of the county. <br /> MR. FUKE: I don ' t know, I guess you get <br /> two ways of looking at it. I can ' . just, for example, point <br /> out the State Department of Land and Natural Resources where <br /> you essentially have about four or five major divisions. <br /> You have state parks ; land management ; forestry. In our <br /> past experience, it has been just as difficult in getting <br /> decisions or getting things done through one department in <br /> which you house several major divisions as opposed to also <br /> working with another agency. <br /> I don ' t think , necessarily, the answer is <br /> to putting it all in one house because even within one house <br /> you would have to establish major divisions and in sometimes <br /> getting response from the major divisions , if the department <br /> becomes a very super department, very large, it becomesquite <br /> difficult. <br /> MR. CADINHA: Mr. Fuke, currently how does <br /> a general plan revision come about, mechanically? <br /> - 14 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.