Laserfiche WebLink
start and where they end in the business of transferring funds <br /> arou'n'd. It seems to me that we need some charter language <br /> which straightens that paragraph out and says that above a <br /> certain amount any rt.ransfer of appropriated funds has tobe <br /> done with council approval. <br /> The next area that we think we need some <br /> controls is in relation to the budget. The growth of the <br /> budget; the growth of the debt and the property taxes. <br /> All of the proposals that we have put in our <br /> letter we try to be reasonable about. There arelimits that <br /> can be lived with today but they do put a certain amount of <br /> brake or lid on what happens in the future. For instance;' <br /> the first requirement is that the operating budget should be <br /> balanced. In other words, we should know where the money <br /> comes from before we put it in the budget. Incidentally, this <br /> is in the present charter-this is nothing new. But the rate <br /> of growth of that budget, we think , should be tied to the rate <br /> of growth of the county economy. We propose that it be <br /> measured by the growth ;i>n the excise tax. It is a little un. <br /> clear in our letter as to what we really meant and we spoke <br /> about 4% as a basic tax rate of the excise tax, well, now that <br /> isn ' t quite true looking at it. And I also found out that <br /> there is available on a yearly basis the so-called excise tax <br /> base of the county so that may be a good measure of the rate of <br /> growth of the county economy. I might point out that the con- <br /> con amendments of this past year-that was one of the things, <br /> that was imposed on the rate of growth of the state budget that <br /> it should be tied to the economy. <br /> Incidentally, as I say, we try to be reasonable <br /> and put limits that can be lived with. A limitation of that <br /> sort is not very far out of line with what has happened over the <br /> past 10 years. Although from year to year thereNhave been some <br /> major increases in the neighborhood of 13% and 14% in the <br /> budget from one year to the next when, the county economy didn ' t <br /> rise that fast. Over the 10 year period the excise tax base and <br /> the county budget has risen approximately the same rate. <br /> Actually, the excise tax rate has risen somewhat less than the <br /> budget. It will provide a cap, certainly, on the rate of rise <br /> of the budget and take off Some of the pressure to look fornew <br /> revenues and new taxes. <br /> Our debt service proposal says that the payments <br /> for principle and interest on the county debt should not exceed <br /> 15% of the 3 year running average of the general fund expendi- <br /> tures. Over the past few years we have been getting quite close <br /> to that 15% limit. The, debt service back in 1968 was 11%. For <br /> a couple of years thereafter it ran around '7%. BiAtarting in <br /> 1972 it jumped up. ' 73 even more up to 12% of the operating <br /> budget and in fiscal 1978 it was 131/2% of the operating budget. <br /> So if you impose a 15% ceiling on it you are not upsetting the <br /> present budget. Nothing drastic has to happen as to the amount <br /> of money that can be borrowed but you are putting a lihit on it <br /> in the future. And a 15% limit', I think , is really quite <br /> reasonable. <br /> - 4 <br />