Laserfiche WebLink
The other concern, I guess, is the matter of <br /> getting the people in to meet because of the outlying residences <br /> more than once or twice a week. <br /> It will have to be under the Sunshine Law, no <br /> question. <br /> MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman, we could perhaps <br /> start with a page by page and see how it goes and maybe if it <br /> looks like we are not going to have time we may have to go into <br /> subcommittees which would have to be in a public hearing type <br /> of atmosphere. From my opinion as to what has been presented <br /> to us there are not that many different areas of concern and can <br /> be boiled down to about a half dozen primary concerns that maybe <br /> will take a lot of discussion. Some will fall in. . .as the <br /> decisions are made, other things will fall in. I think it would <br /> take more time to break into subcommittees, to find a place to <br /> meet and to try to get everybody together from the different <br /> geographical areas to have a subcommittee. That is just my <br /> opinion. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: I would assume then that as far as <br /> the progress of this commission is concerned that in the event <br /> we are pressed for time, then that means that we are going to be <br /> meeting for more than once a week, as a body. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: We will have to, if we are <br /> going to meet the deadline. <br /> MR. SENSANO: Mr. Chairman. I think it would be <br /> wise if we followed the idea embodied in the motion. Because I <br /> am afraid that if_ we do something which may be out of line, up <br /> to that point, whatever we have accomplished may be thrown out. <br /> And we may lose more time. I don' t know what the feeling of the <br /> rest of the commissioners are but if there has been no public <br /> input on certain portions, my idea is to just leave them alone. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Are there any other suggestions <br /> or comments on the procedure? Mr. Oda? <br /> MR. ODA: I might be getting ahead a little bit, <br /> but if whatever procedure is selected by this commission, there <br /> was a comment made that some people be invited back to speak. I <br /> would in that case that is done,that it is made only for the <br /> purpose of clarification rather than repitition of testimony. <br /> If it is going to be repeating testimony, I think we are giving <br /> an unfair advantage to only those who are invited. We would have <br /> to give the public the right to come in and make whatever state- <br /> ments they want all over again. So we will have to be careful <br /> we are fair to those people who haven' t had a chance to say: <br /> anything or who just didn ' t say anything and not give an over- <br /> advantage to others who said something just to repeat what they <br /> said. <br /> -4- <br />