My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-06-05
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-06-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:45:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
6/5/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-06-05
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
talking about him behind his back without giving him the <br /> opportunity to answer. I just wonder if perhaps--and I <br /> reluctantly do it, but perhaps this particular section could <br /> be tabled until we get some concrete answers. . .either from the <br /> man , himself, or from the mayor. I don ' t see how we can act <br /> with these kinds of questions in our minds. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Do we have any discussion? <br /> MR. CADINHA: Akira, you people put this in <br /> the last charter. Under the board of supervisors, did the <br /> mayor always have an equivalent that department heads reported <br /> to? <br /> MR. OMONAKA: If I remember the old setup, the <br /> board of supervisors, each member had equal powers with the <br /> mayor and they had the right to go to every department. So, <br /> this is why we changed the concept to say that, okay, you have <br /> a legislative board and an.''administrative .board. I think the <br /> present setup, from what I hear from people within the county <br /> there is no particular problem. I don ' t see the need for any <br /> change. <br /> MR. CADINHA: Well , I move to approve Section <br /> 5-1.4, 1 .5 , and 1.6, as it reads. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: What are you into now, Harlan? <br /> MR. CADINHA: I move that we approve everything <br /> with the exception of 5-1_. 7. The only reason I leave that <br /> out is we have got to =.clarif.y : what impeachment proceedings <br /> are and we cover that one more time. But everything else, I <br /> move that we just adopt as is. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: I second the motion. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: It has been moved and seconded <br /> that we adopt Section 5-1.4, 5-1.5 , and 5-1 .6 as written in the <br /> charter. Any discussion on this? Any other discussion? If <br /> not, are you ready for the question? It has been moved and <br /> seconded that we approve Section 5-1.4, 5-1 .5 , and 5-1.6 as <br /> stated in the charter. <br /> (A roll call vote was taken and carried <br /> with Mrs. Kobayashi dissenting. ) <br /> SECTION Mr. Cadinha, you commented on 5-1.7. <br /> =77-- <br /> MR. <br /> -- <br /> MR. CADINHA: Yes, 5-1. 7. How do we remove the <br /> mayor? We covered that one time with our counsel <br /> about what impeachment proceedings were. The law does not lay <br /> that out. So, let ' s say we have a banana that gets appointed <br /> mayor and the guy, obviously, becomes a difficult person. Is <br /> this removal step sufficiently clear, Stuart? 5-1. 7? <br /> MR. ODA: I don ' t know of anything else in the <br /> charter. <br /> -13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.