My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-06-12
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-06-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:49:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
6/12/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-06-12
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. ISHIDA: Mr. Chairman. Stuart, why seven <br /> members? <br /> MR. ODA: Because I consolidated two boards. <br /> MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman, would you call for <br /> the question? <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: One more question. Where does <br /> it have here the deletion of that portion. . . . <br /> MR. ODA: I just didn ' t include it. So by not <br /> including it, you delete it. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: You delete it automatically. <br /> MR. ODA: There isa provision in there according <br /> to the State Administrative Provision, Procedures Act that <br /> spells out almost exactly. . . . <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any other discussion? <br /> MR. OMONAKA: Mr. Chairman. The intent of the <br /> motion, then, is to delete Section 5-4.4 and combine only. <br /> It has nothing to do with any other section with regard to <br /> Planning Director or the Planning Commission. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: The motion then is to delete <br /> Section 5-4.4 and add Section 5-6.3. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: The Board of Appeals would not <br /> be in the Planning Department section but would be under the <br /> Miscellaneous section, Chapter 6. Section 5-6.3. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: Some more discussion, Mr. Chairman. <br /> Stuart , can you explain that. . . "The board of appeals shall hear <br /> and determine appeals from the actions of the director and <br /> planning commission as permitted by law"? <br /> MR. ODA: Well , whatever the charter says is <br /> appealable, the board can hear. In other words, if the Planning <br /> Director makes a. . .processes an application to the Planning <br /> Commission and from there the guy is not satisfied with the <br /> decision, that means he can appeal it under the charter through <br /> the planning. . . . <br /> MR. OMONAKA: Then , by virtue of adopting this <br /> proposal then ,- the intent is to go from the Planning Director <br /> through the Commission, then to the Board. Is this right? <br /> MR. ODA: Right. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: So then you are changing the <br /> concept, a little bit, by adopting this? <br /> MR. ODA: Right. There will be another. . .Planning <br /> Commission. Some of these things are strictly from the Planning <br /> Director to the board. Other things go through the Planning <br /> Commission. <br /> -32- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.