My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-07-11
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-07-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 10:37:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
7/11/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-07-11
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. ODA: It is a dormant agency, right now. <br /> Upon checking on it, we found out that it may be reincarnated <br /> because of the recent purchase by the group of people of the <br /> large Richardson estate property. There is some talk now of <br /> reviving the redevelopment agency for that purpose. It is still <br /> on the books and it may be, as I said, revived. <br /> MRS. KOBAYASHI : Was that a commission? <br /> MR. ODA: The Hawaii Redevelopment Agency? I <br /> think it was a regular--I don ' t know who it was attached to, <br /> but maybe it was attached to Public Works. I am not absolutely <br /> sure on that. We did check on that. <br /> Subsection ( a) . In 16-4 ( a) we deleted that <br /> last portion of that last sentence regarding. ./beyond twelve <br /> months after the full effective date of this charter®_% And, <br /> instead added the language. . .in accordance with this amended <br /> charter. Because the board members in the commissions wou d <br /> have to be appointed according to the amended charter. <br /> Subsection 16-4 (b) and (c) were considered no <br /> longer necessary since they are no longer applicable regarding <br /> the office of the county auditor, puchasing agent, elected <br /> county clerk and the county attorney. <br /> In place of the deleted subsection (b) was <br /> inserted the provision--if you will follow the xerox--abolishing <br /> the public works board of appeals because of the consolidation <br /> with the planning board of appeals in Section 5-6.3 and mandating <br /> that the mayor appoint two members of the present board of <br /> appeals to be added on to make it seven , a seven member board. <br /> I think that provision regarding the appointment for three years <br /> would have to be changed. The mayor shall appoint two members <br /> to the present planning board of appeals. . .I think we should <br /> stop it there. Delete the last two sections in that on the <br /> xerox /one member for a term of two years and one member for a <br /> term of three years. Members shall thereafter be appointed for <br /> a term of three years.? Those provisions should be deleted. <br /> I would suggest that the language The mayor shall appoint. . . <br /> perhaps the word additional members to the present planning <br /> board of appeals. <br /> Section 5-6.3 was an added on section to the <br /> miscellaneous, Chapter 6. 5-6.3. Board of Appeals. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: Section 5-7.3. <br /> MR. ODA: It has been redesignated as Chapter 7, <br /> so it would be Section 5-7.3. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: Stuart, since this board of appeals <br /> is a new body. . . <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: . . .this is not the regular board <br /> of appeals, right? <br /> MR. ODA: The point that Richard is making is <br /> -38- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.