My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-07-18
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-07-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 10:40:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
7/18/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-07-18
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because this involves not only this particular motion but <br /> every other change that has been made in the charter, that <br /> we have made, so this is no different than any other change <br /> that has been made. It is just that this carries one <br /> additional option. <br /> MR. ODA: I 'm looking at the 1972 City and <br /> County of Honolulu ballot. They already had a charter and <br /> they had two options, two different options but there is no <br /> option as to the then present charter. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: It ' s a two part question on that <br /> ballot. . It says, if you want the nine then you select which <br /> option. <br /> MR. SENSANO: We have to make sure that we <br /> don ' t have the confusing ballot like they had for the ConCon. <br /> MR. TRULSON: This ballot says if you agree <br /> should it be revised and if you say yes then you vote for <br /> #1 or #2. . . <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Are we discussing the points of <br /> this motion? Or are we discussing ballot design? <br /> MR. ISHIDA: I think we are discussing the <br /> substance of this because I think it is vital as to what are <br /> we really presenting to the electorate. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Yes, Richard, but what we are <br /> talking about is not only this motion but it involves every <br /> other change that we have made. That ' s the consideration <br /> we have to take in ballot design for everything else. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: This is not ballot design. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Why? <br /> MR. ISHIDA: Because we are, in fact, giving <br /> them only two options, or are we giving them three options? <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: It just happens the only difference <br /> between this motion and every other change that we have made <br /> here is that this particular motion has two options, a 5-2 and <br /> a straight 9 man council. That' s the only difference. When <br /> we reconsidered these other options, or these other changes <br /> that have been made, ballot design comes into play, also, <br /> because there are a number of changes that the voter has to be <br /> aware of does he want to retain what exists today or is he <br /> going to take over what is subject to change. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: I need to understand what the <br /> effect of it is when it is presented. If, under your two plans, <br /> we put these two options, what I want to know definitely or <br /> legally, is if we present these two options as you have stated, <br /> is it going to be one, or two, or is it going to be three? <br /> That ' s what I want to know. <br /> -10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.