My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-07-18
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-07-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 10:40:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
7/18/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-07-18
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. TRULSON: Is that a motion, Mr. Omonaka? <br /> MR. OMONAKA: No, Mr. Schutte wanted some <br /> discussion on this. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Yes, I would like a little more <br /> discussion on it. Akira has made one suggestion. If other <br /> commissioners would so discuss it. I was looking over the <br /> reapportionment section, Stuart, would you go to reapportion- <br /> ment under your proposals. That would be line (g) , subsection <br /> (g ) . I 'm trying to put language in there that could be used <br /> so that it would reflect any of the three alternative <br /> proposals. <br /> Right now it says the commission may apportion <br /> the five district council seats. What I 'm looking at is saying <br /> the commission may apportion the council district seats, then <br /> if that would take into consideration any one of the options <br /> that may be voted for. <br /> MR. ODA: The present charter doesn ' t have any <br /> district seats. It refers to geographical districts. <br /> Residents of Puna, Ka'u, etc. So it ' s not really districting <br /> in a true sense. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: I understand. How can we reword <br /> this particular section to take into consideration. . .the bottom <br /> portion I believe is no problem. . .what we are looking at is <br /> just this one section giving them the authority to do this. <br /> In case the 5-2 goes in, they may do it, or the 9. . .just <br /> change the language on it. Which would be acceptable, legally, <br /> to allow this to happen? That seems to be the only portion <br /> of this reapportionment that should be changed. <br /> MR. ODA: I don ' t know. Offhand, I can 't. . . <br /> because the present charter doesn ' t have any such House District <br /> designation, right now, I just don 't have the appropriate <br /> language to put in. I ' ll just have to sit down and work it <br /> out because the word "district" won ' t have the same significance <br /> as the House District. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE : What were you referring to, Stuart, <br /> when you said may apportion a five district council seats? <br /> You were talking about the 5-2? <br /> MR. ODA: The 5-2 system. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: So if we you referred to the <br /> five district council seats? <br /> MR. ODA: Well , supposing, you see. . .what I am <br /> thinking about. . .supposing the present charter provision <br /> prevails? <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: That ' s what I 'm saying. What <br /> language can we use in that particular line? Would it be <br /> appropriate. . . <br /> -14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.