My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-08-14
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-08-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 10:51:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
8/14/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-08-14
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. YAMADA: This is not so unusual in that <br /> state-wide you ' ll find this all over where some districts <br /> will vote for one representative to the city council or to <br /> the house and some will vote for three or four in the state <br /> Legislatures and the other councils. It ' s not so unusual . <br /> Thank you. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any other questions? Thank <br /> you , very much. <br /> MR. SANTOS: My name is Robert Santos and I <br /> represent the Hawaii Island Chamber of Commerce. My primary <br /> reason in wanting to talk to you today is the concern of the <br /> proposed ballot wording which contains these options. <br /> I find it inconceivable that anyone would find <br /> it fair that less than a majority of the votes would decide <br /> such an important matter to the County of Hawaii as the makeup <br /> or the method of electing the county council. <br /> As Mr. Schutte mentioned in his example, and <br /> to expand on that a little bit, if we do have 23, 000 votes <br /> cast--and I think that that is a most optimistic figure. . .but, <br /> let ' s suppose that we do get 23 , 000 votes and supposing that <br /> 10, 000 voters say na, we should not change, and 13,000 voters <br /> say yes, we should change. And of the two options the vote <br /> is split 7,000 and 6,000. Is it really fair that 7,000 voters <br /> will have decided how we are to elect our councilmen for the <br /> next ten years , at least? We talk about fairness in the <br /> election process , to me, this method is the most unfair <br /> proposal that I have seen suggested in all of my time. <br /> Our county has become great. One of the great <br /> nations in the world, primarily, because of its method of <br /> making decisions in which the majority rules. Please, let ' s <br /> not begin a change now where we are going to have the minority <br /> ruling. <br /> I do want to, on behalf of the Chamber, <br /> reiterate our support of the 5-2 plan. I do want to say that, <br /> like Mr. Yamada, we feel that we could live with the 5-4 plan. <br /> However, we find that there is no way that we could accept the <br /> single member district plan. <br /> First of all , the temporary arrangement is <br /> totally unsatisfactory. We cannot see where a district such <br /> as Ka 'u or Hamakua would have two councilmen during that <br /> temporary period, while Kona would have two, also, and South <br /> Hilo would have only three. <br /> Secondly, we do not feel , and we are very <br /> adamant in this position, that a single member district setup <br /> could possibly work in such a small legislative body. <br /> We strongly urge you to, first of all , give the <br /> voters a choice between the present system and a system that <br /> you feel should be an alternative. And we strongly urge you to <br /> make that alternative one of the two plans proposed, either the <br /> 5-2 or the 5-4. Thank you. <br /> -23- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.