My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-05-15 PH
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearing
>
CHC 1979-05-15 PH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:37:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
5/15/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-05-15
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Have declared no affiliation with principal or platform and <br /> are non-partisans who would find it almost impossible under <br /> our election laws to qualify for any elective office. <br /> The party asks , how can we afford such <br /> discrimination between those who participate in the policy <br /> making and decision making process of our government on <br /> elective and appointive bases? The present lack of clarity <br /> as to this in the County Charter and the present lack of <br /> ordinance, thereto, has resulted in discrimination against <br /> members of either political party as appointees to boards <br /> and commissions. <br /> These boards and commissions are an integral <br /> part of our county government and an integral part of our <br /> political structure and ought they not to be subject to the <br /> same political qualifications as candidates for elective <br /> office? <br /> If our mayor and county council ran for <br /> office and were elected on a non-partisan basis, then the <br /> present system of appointments to boards and commissions <br /> would be valid. <br /> We protest that grave injustice and discrim- <br /> ination prevails in this matter, and we urge the commissioners <br /> to change the language or to recommend that the voters approve <br /> the language change of 13-4-( f) to read, "A majority of the <br /> appointees to each board and commission shall be members in <br /> good standing of the political party for which the largest <br /> number of votes were cast in the primary election preceding <br /> their appointment. " <br /> In the testimony which we submitted to you <br /> in writing, earlier, we attached as reference and resource <br /> material to our testimony, the correspondence of March 2, 1979 <br /> from Deputy Corporation Counsel Alan Okamoto to Deputy County <br /> Clerk Yasuki Arakaki . We would appreciate the commission ' s <br /> serious discussion and attention to this because we feel that <br /> whichever political party has the majority of elected officials <br /> in power, then the appointive boards and commissions should <br /> reflect the philosophy of the people in power. We feel that <br /> we are otherwise going in the direction of government by <br /> personality rather than by principal. We feel that is the <br /> wrong direction to go. <br /> MR. CADINHA: Ms. Tabrah, I have a question <br /> with regard to that. Do you really feel that party philosophy <br /> carries down to the county level? A county our size? <br /> MS. TABRAH : That ' s why I 'm county chairman. <br /> That is what we are trying to make happen. We are trying to <br /> get people to take a different look at government and not <br /> accept the fact that corruption is a part of the political <br /> process and to go back to the old idea of politics. Politics <br /> is people. The contemporary, current aim of today' s <br /> -30- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.