My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-07-02 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
2018-07-02 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2018 3:47:58 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 9:03:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – July 2, 2018 <br />– and so the National Park Service is one of those agencies under the <br />umbrella of the Department of Interior and the purpose of the Department of <br />the Interior is really to protect and manage the nation’s natural and cultural <br />resources. We provide scientific and other information about those resources <br />and honor the trust responsibilities or other special commitment that to <br />American Indians, Alaska natives and affiliated island communities. The U.S. <br />Forest Service, on the other hand, is a part of the Department of Agriculture <br />and not part of the Interior Department and they have a different focus of <br />intent for their lands that they manage so... And this statement here is that the <br />Park Service, which employees park rangers – is interested in the <br />preservation of land in its natural state and that’s a primary piece of any Park <br />Service legislation – so when you’ll see that in the Organic Act that we that is <br />– that was passed 24 days after Hawaii Volcanoes became a park there was <br />actually the Organic Act came a little bit later for the Park Service as a whole. <br />So and the language that is in the Organic Act really mimics what was in the <br />enabling legislation for Hawaii Volcanoes National Park – so when you see <br />the Organic Act – it’s very familiar – you read through it and so you’ll see the <br />same kind of language used for Hawaii Volcanoes National Park or Hawaii <br />National Park at the time. <br /> <br />th <br /> So as we progressed into the early part of the 20 century there were a <br />number of acts of congress – these are bills that have to go forward and have <br />to be vetted through congress in order to be implemented within the state. For <br />our part – we can start off with the Act o 1920 and then early on these are <br />acts that identified specific land pieces to become – to be included in the Park <br />itself and so over this last century a number of these acts were introduced for <br />various reasons and I’m gonna give you a few of those reasons here. So <br />early on, you know, the area surrounding the summit was an area used for <br />grazing animals. A number of ranches were in the neighborhood and <br />landowners – Bishop Estate and others – other lands that were leased from <br />Bishop Estate and managed by individual, private entities – at that time <br />allowed leases to be held by individuals who managed large tracts of land <br />that eventually were included in the Park. So Ainahou is one of those <br />examples – but that didn’t come to us until the 70s. So this included land <br />where Kilauea Military Camp is and I’m not sure if you knew that that <br />particular parcel of land was originally Bishop Estate and it came to the <br />National Park Service in 1922. So by 1930 we have – this is a particular <br />interest – this particular act by the time that it was modified over the years <br />and implementation went into the 60s basically for this particular act and it <br />included language to allow adjacent community members access to the Park <br />lands in Puna – later referred to as the Kalapana Extension. And the <br />individuals that were living in that area of Puna – adjacent to the Park – had <br />special commitments – the federal government made special commitments to <br />them and they were identified in the act – so individuals from that community <br />who have maintained a residence in Puna maintained their special <br />relationship and special status within the Park. So this allows some of those <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.