My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-07-05 Hearing Transcript - Dien-Jung Lin REZ 07-071
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-07-05 Hearing Transcript - Dien-Jung Lin REZ 07-071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2018 1:49:10 PM
Creation date
8/13/2018 1:49:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
establish a commercial use, be that the conversion to an office use or a bed & breakfast on the <br />subject properties. And, we've changed several of the other conditions so that the trigger for <br />many of those conditions is based on the commencement of a commercial use. <br />So, I'd be happy to answer any questions the Commission may have on the application. <br />IKEDA: Christian, I'm kind of confused because it looks like it is two parcels. <br />KAY: That's correct. <br />IKEDA: And, one is asking for an extension. I understand that, but at the same time they want <br />to build a bed & breakfast or they're going to use the old building on parcel 26 as a bed & <br />breakfast. <br />KAY: So, my understanding is that at this time, that is a long-term rental, the structure on the <br />parcel, on parcel 26. Plans in the future are to remove that dwelling, move it to another property <br />and build a new structure to run as a bed & breakfast, but that's not in the immediate plans. The <br />priority the Applicant has shared with us is to get the conversion of offices done. The request <br />initially was for both parcels to be rezoned, so we have to take both parcels into account as we're <br />doing a time extension. <br />IKEDA: Yeah, I was thinking it's kind of strange. It should be only—in each parcel, should <br />have your own application, one being a time extension and the other is a Change of Zone so <br />KAY: Well, the Change of Zone took place, so this is just a time extension to a condition of the <br />Change of Zone. <br />IKEDA: No, but what I'm saying is you know they're combining the parcels. Is the parcels <br />combined or is it two separate parcels? <br />KAY: They are two separate parcels, and there was a condition in the original Change of Zone <br />that let me find it here, pardon me—Condition number d or letter d. "The Applicant shall <br />either consolidate parcels 25 and 26 prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval for any development <br />on the property or shall establish cross -easements to permit a traffic circulation between" the two <br />parcels "that would implement in connection," we added, "the establishment of a commercial <br />use, any construction of new buildings or any subdivision of the properties. Any access points <br />other than the existing driveway shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public <br />Works." So, there was some consideration at the time the Change of Zone was originally <br />granted in 2008 to either consolidate into one parcel or create that cross -easement situation. <br />IKEDA: But, actually right now, all they're concerned about is the time extension. Is that <br />correct? <br />KAY: Yeah, so the time extension was, the way that the condition originally read in 2008 was to <br />finalize completion of the conversation into office use. But now that we understood that there is <br />a possibility of a changed scenario where they may do a bed & breakfast, we added that in as <br />EXHIBIT C <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.