My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-06-21 Leeward Exh A (AMEND SMA 05-005)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-06-21 Leeward Exh A (AMEND SMA 05-005)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2018 2:43:55 PM
Creation date
8/16/2018 2:43:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
folks were still required to put in that connector road, correct? So it wasn’t as if you were <br />responsible to do the construction from your north boundary to Kuakini. <br /> <br />LIM: That’s correct. Condition (K) of Ordinance 87 47 required “that the petitioner shall <br />construct and complete a connecting road between the Ali‘i Highway and Ali‘i Drive, meeting <br />with the approval of the Chief Engineer, prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits for those <br />portions of the subject property makai of the Ali‘i Highway.” How that got implemented in the <br />SMA permit with Director Yuen at the time was that the green and yellow mauka-makai <br />roadway that you see there, so that will be the connecting road. The other question that was <br />related to that was whether or not the Ali‘i Highway was, I mean the K to K Parkway, excuse <br />me, was going to continue in a northerly direction past this property up into Kuakini Highway, <br />and I don’t know if you have a zoning map to show, but on my zoning map it shows the subject <br />property here and it shows a right-of-way in the adjoining property going all way up to Kuakini <br />Highway. And I do know that there is another further connection mauka of Kuakini Highway. <br />So the alignment is still preserved, and we’ll be donating per the requirements of the ordinance <br />the right-of-way for the K to K Parkway within our property to the County free of charge. <br /> <br />DARROW: Just to clarify, so I think what the questions is is that the applicant would not be <br />responsible for constructing the K to K Parkway through your property and up to Kuakini, <br />correct? <br /> <br />LIM: That’s correct. <br /> <br />DARROW: Okay. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Can I add to that? <br /> <br />UNGER: Go ahead. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Condition (J)(1) of the ordinance says that the petitioner alone or in cooperation <br />with other property owners, subject to review of the Chief Engineer, shall either construct and <br />dedicate the portion of Ali‘i Highway from Kuakini Highway to the southern end of the subject <br />property, or dedicate the right-of-way and pay the pro rata fee share. So it was supposed to be <br />done with the property owner to the north in conjunction with them. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Yeah, so the entire burden is not on Sunstone to do that. <br /> <br />UNGER: Right, to connect all the way to, okay. Commissioner Church. <br /> <br />CHURCH: Okay, just a little confusion on my part here. I thought I heard Mr. DeWeese say <br />that before occupancy permit was to be granted for Block D, that this Ali‘i to Kuakini roadway <br />had to be completed. That’s what I thought I heard — <br />12 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.