My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-06-21 Leeward Exh A (AMEND SMA 05-005)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-06-21 Leeward Exh A (AMEND SMA 05-005)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2018 2:43:55 PM
Creation date
8/16/2018 2:43:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNGER: Okay. Also, under water permits, No. 7 on the Planning Department recommendation, <br />it shows that “Water Supply within 90 days from the effective date of the SMA Use Permit for <br />the initial commitment of 77 units of water”; on the background report No. 26 on Page 8 states <br />that additional, “75 additional units of water have been allocated to the permit \[area\].” <br /> <br />JACKSON: Yes. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay. So, if that’s the case, again, when the applicants come up, we can talk more <br />about that, but that probably should be reflected in these conditions as well, just acknowledging <br />that there is another 75 permits. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Yeah. So there’s actually 77 units, 75 plus the original two — <br /> <br />UNGER: Correct — <br /> <br />JACKSON: — assigned to the lots. <br /> <br />UNGER: — for a total of 152. <br /> <br />JACKSON: No. <br /> <br />UNGER: No? <br /> <br />JACKSON: No. So the way it works is each lot is assigned one unit, and then they have 75 <br />additional units for a total of 77. So they, the applicant has secured water commitments for 77 <br />units. <br /> <br />UNGER: Total? <br /> <br />JACKSON: Total. <br /> <br />UNGER: Oh, okay. <br /> <br />JACKSON: And if we were to amend the condition, we would recommend going ahead and <br />striking out the first sentence, but putting something in there stating that it’s the applicant’s <br />responsibility to maintain those water commitments and not let them lapse. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay. <br /> <br />JACKSON: And then the second line would stand that they need to obtain additional water <br />commitments to develop future units beyond the 77. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay. And then just a general discussion, I think it’s important for this project, can <br />you just, I mean a brief update on the Keāhole \[sic\] Kahului Parkway? I mean, is that still on the <br />book? Is that something that, because there’s, there’s some consequences to whether going in or <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.