Laserfiche WebLink
Masuda: And what would happened, Mr. Greenwell, if I may, is if they do get the <br />building and then they have everything approved, they can just go in immediately and <br />not have to wait for the Commission’s action. <br /> <br />Greenwell: But Brandon said they have to do an inspection. <br /> <br />Masuda: Yes, but that’s going to be before the activation; an inspection will happen. <br /> <br />Salāve‘a: But not in front of the Commission. <br /> <br />Masuda: But not in front of the Commission. So they will do whatever they have to do <br />within the County. If they can get Planning to change their mind, fine. As long as they <br />satisfy Liquor Department as far as upon the final inspection they have everything <br />covered, Liquor Department will then issue them their activation. Six months from the <br />activation, they’ll come before the board and tell us how it’s going. If it’s a full-on service <br />building, then I’m sure the Department will give us the status of that and tell them, okay, <br />it’s like a regular building, it’s no longer some kind of temporary or in between kind of a <br />situation. <br /> <br />Taniguchi: They already have the license. <br /> <br />Greenwell: I understand that. <br /> <br />Taniguchi: So this is for that outside thing. That’s why we voted for that—the request <br />for a status update in six months. <br /> <br />Greenwell: My next question is I don’t know how to word a motion to bring them back. <br /> <br />Masuda: If I may, Mr. Chairman, an appropriate motion could just say, “Upon activation <br />of their license, the Department will have a status report prepared for the Commission, <br />and the applicants brought back in six-months.” Upon the activation, so they have to be <br />functioning as a liquor licensee distributor. <br /> <br />Taniguchi: Because actually, if they go into the building already, then it’s moot. Right? <br /> <br />Gonzalez: Yes. This is a good discussion because what we’re trying to game plan is for <br />things really out of our control. Because one way this can go is they are held to build a <br />more permanent structure with four solid walls and a solid roof. The footprint of that <br />building could be bigger or smaller than what we approved. We would need updated <br />drawings from them when we go for our liquor inspection to say this is the area for liquor <br />consumption. It could get smaller or it could get bigger. The other departments that <br />have control over approving what they operate out of might say they can put up some <br />kind of temporary structure that has fire retardant canvas or roofing. <br /> <br />So, if the question is whether or not the Commission wants to go and take another stab <br />at its approval of the liquor sales because there’s no clear picture of what they’re going <br />to sell out of, then that is a valid question. But, if you look at it from this perspective: <br />July 5, 2018 – LIQUOR COMMISSION MINUTES 20 <br /> <br /> <br />