Laserfiche WebLink
Appeal on land value. <br />Appellant presented her case. County presented their case and recommended sustaining the land <br />value at $270,400. A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Takai moved to sustain the County's position of removing the agricultural use, the land <br />value remains at $270,400 with the homeowners' class in place. Seconded by Mr. Hughes. A <br />call for discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 5:0. <br />CASE #28068 — GATEWAY MANAGEMENT COMPANY <br />TMK 1-4-093-003-0000 <br />Appellant was not present. <br />Ms. Costa presented to the Board appellant's request to withdraw their appeal for Case No. 28068. A <br />call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Takai moved to accept the withdrawal. Seconded by Mr. Harano. A call for discussion <br />was made. Motion passed by a vote of 5:0. <br />WITHDRAWN CASES <br />County presented to the Board appellants' requests to withdraw their appeals for the following cases: <br />Case No. <br />28065 <br />TMK 1-3-008-019-0000 <br />MARTYCHENKO, SERGY <br />Case No. <br />28067 <br />TMK 1-4-071-006-0000 <br />MINDFUL LIVING LLC <br />Case No. <br />28070 <br />TMK 2-5-040-030-0000 <br />ZUANICH, BETSY <br />Case No. <br />28155 <br />TMK 9-9-005-015-0000 <br />BUCK, JAMES D & LAURA L <br />A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Takai moved to accept the withdrawals for the four appeals. Seconded by Mr. Hughes. A <br />call for discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 5:0. <br />CASE #28066 — STRISSEL, ARTHUR GENE <br />TMK 1-4-019-009-0000 <br />Appellant was not present. Ms. Costa presented for the County. <br />Ms. Costa informed the Board that due to the change in assessments in the Puna District due to the <br />recent lava inundation, values were adjusted accordingly for the properties affected in the area. This <br />particular property for Case No. 28066 is located in the area and the property values would have <br />been decreased to a lesser value than the settlement by the Real Property Tax Office, however, due <br />to the pending appeal the division could not proceed with the adjustment. The County recommends <br />that the Board deny the current settlement agreement between the County and the appellant and <br />reduce the total value to zero ($-0-). A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Takai moved to deny the settlement as presented for Case No. 28066. Seconded by Mr. <br />Hughes. A call for discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 5:0. <br />3 <br />