2018-08-13 Hearing Transcript - Piilani Partners LLC REZ 727 SMA 18-070 REVOCATION SMA 334

Home

Here is Pi`ilani Street looking east toward Manono with the subject parcel on the left and Pi`ilani Street looking west toward the State park with the subject property on the right. The Planning Director is recommending the following. A favorable recommendation be sent to the County Council on the Change of Zone amendment, approval with conditions on the new SMA permit, and approval of the revocation request for the old SMA permit. That concludes my presentation. I'd be happy to answer any questions that the Commission may have. CLARKSON: Any questions for Christian? I have one question. Can you go back to the zoning? I was just struck by the fact that it's an Industrially zoned parcel surrounded by Resort parcels that are apparently from the photographs are not occupied by any Resort structures, but - KAY: That's correct. Yeah, so, the—there were two actions back in the early nineties. In 1991. the General Plan was amended to Industrial from, I believe, the surrounding Medium Density Urban, and then in 1992, the rezone and SMA were granted. So, this was specifically, the action was specifically approved based on that fish processing plant for Suisan in relationship to their auction area. CLARKSON: I don't remember from the Background Report, but are there, were there any more stringent than usual noise or other kinds of conditions put on the rezone? KAY: So, yes, in response to Dr. Camblor's letter, we recommended to require landscaping requirements that had to do with Industrial, that is adjacent to Residential which is greaterso, the landscaping is basically going to create an opaque screen between the ground and six feet high and then intermittent screening up to 20 feet high which wouldn't normally be the requirement in that case. And, they'd also be required to meet the State Department of Health noise guidelines for industrial uses. CLARKSON: And, well, that's pretty, pretty loud for regularI was actually referring to the original rezone, but I'm glad to know about that. KAY: Not that I'm aware of in the original rezone, yeah, I don't think it was a consideration. CLARKSON: There wasn't? KAY: Yeah. CLARKSON: Okay. Thank you. KAY: You're welcome. CLARKSON: No further questions? We'll proceed. Will the Applicant or their representative or both please come forward? Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter before the Planning Commission today? EXHIBIT B 4