My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-08-08.HamakuaCDP.MeetingReport.Draft
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Steering Committee
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
2017-08-08.HamakuaCDP.MeetingReport.Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2018 3:24:43 PM
Creation date
9/7/2018 3:24:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
147 Ms. Gloor addressed Mr.Chung's question regarding the reasoning behind the suggested change <br />148 in land use. Referencing the CDP policy rationale, Ms. Gloor explained that there are three <br />149 shoreline parcels with County industrial zoning and that while the CDP recommends changing <br />150 the designation for these parcels to LUPAG Open, the land maintains its underlying Industrial <br />151 zoning and its associated permitted uses. The CDP does not have authority to change zoning. Ms. <br />152 Gloor also explained that the designation of LUPAG Open was chosen as the community's <br />153 preference after lengthy discussions relating to protecting coastal resources, viewshed <br />154 preservation, and a desire for preserving open space. She ended by clarifying that Policy 1 of the <br />155 CDP states that if there is a direct conflict between the CDP and the General Plan, the General <br />156 Plan, including the LUPAG, shall be controlling. <br />157 Mr. Chung referred to the testimony of another gentlemen in which he stated that if the Hakalau <br />158 property were to be sold, then the property would lose its entitlements. He asked if this was <br />159 correct. <br />160 Ms. Gloor replied that statement was incorrect. <br />161 Mr. Chung asked Chair Poindexter for a five-minute recess. <br />162 Chair Poindexter called for a five-minute recess at 10:38 A.M. <br />163 The meeting reconvened at 10:44 A.M. <br />164 Mr. Chung stated after thinking it over that he would be supporting Bill 161. He expressed that <br />165 he still has concern for how the issue could be interpreted in court later on, but stated that he <br />166 would be voting "yes" to Bill 161. <br />167 Following the discussion Chair Poindexter called for a vote to adopt Bill 161. <br />168 Vote on Bill 161 (Adopted): <br />169 The motion to pass Bill 161 on second and final reading was carried by the following voice vote: <br />170 <br />171 Ayes: Council Members Chung, David, Eoff, Kanuha, Lee Loy, O'Hara, Richards, Ruggles, and Chair <br />172 Poindexter - 9 <br />173 Noes: None. <br />174 Absent: None <br />175 Excused: None. <br />lit <br />179 ADJOURNMENT: The Steering Committee adjourned at the closing of the County Council vote <br />180 on Bill 161. <br />181 To view the full County Council Minutes please use the following link: <br />182 http://records.hawaiicountV.gov/Weblink/0/doc/965337/Pagel.aspx <br />183 <br />www. hiplanninQdept.com plannin a,hawaiicounty.-ov Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.