Laserfiche WebLink
MOORE: And I want to point out that the minimum requirement, if you just go by normal road <br />standards, for South Access Road that’s 104 feet is 60 feet. So a lot of this work has been done <br />already. So again, there’s a through, you know, so a lot of the design work and setbacks, or, not <br />setbacks, the standards have been design-negotiated, and are actually being designed as we <br />speak. <br /> <br />UNGER: Great, thank you. Commissioners, any more questions? Staff, any more comments? <br /> <br />KAY: Right, so Jeff \[Darrow\] was just saying before we go forward and entertain a motion, I <br />just want to nail down what the conditions say, and in conversation with Mr. Moore before <br />hearing, I asked if outside of Condition G, which there were issues and concerns, if he was <br />generally okay with the other changes in the Director’s memo, and he indicated that he was. <br />And if you can confirm on the record — <br /> <br />th <br />MOORE: Yes, absolutely. We are, again, this August 15 we are in agreement with all of the <br />changes contained in here, except for Condition G, and we are in agreement with the proposed <br />changes, the handwritten changes. So based on the, so the revised Condition G and all the other <br />changes proposed by the Planning Director we are in agreement with. And we are also in <br />agreement with Condition K as originally recommended by the Planning Director. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. Can you make an attempt to craft the motion based on this discussion? <br /> <br />KAY: Sure, so, I mean — <br /> <br />UNGER: Oh — <br /> <br />HALL: Wait, wait, let’s have the Commission choose what they would like to do first before we <br />craft a motion. <br /> <br />KAY: Okay, fair enough. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay, in fact, why don’t we go – we still need to open up the public discussion, if <br />there are any – so why don’t we take a seat, and then we’ll let the process go as it will. <br /> <br />MOORE: And again, just thanks to the staff and the Director for, again, their just cooperation in <br />working with us. <br /> <br />UNGER: Great, you’re welcome. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Actually, if you don’t mind if I ask a question to the applicant. <br /> <br />UNGER: Sure. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Thank you. Just looking at the maps presented and the site plan, there is an <br />archaeological protection purposes easement up, that runs mauka-makai, and then right at the <br />Kamanu Street, is that another archaeological site, the little squiggly lines in there? <br />13 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />