My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Comm No 0005.01 - GMAC Legislative HIstory - Sept 14 2018
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2018
>
Communications
>
Comm No 0005.01 - GMAC Legislative HIstory - Sept 14 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:39:19 AM
Creation date
10/2/2018 9:08:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transcript of Bill 260 from the June 19, 2012, Council meeting: <br />» Bill 260 initiates an amendment to the Hawaii County Charter, 2010, by amending <br />Articles 6, Chapter 9, by creating a new section relating to a game management advisory <br />commission. Creates a game management advisory commission consisting of nine <br />members who shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the council. This <br />commission shall advise county, state, and federal agencies on matters relating to the <br />preservation of subsistence hunting and fishing as well as protecting traditional and <br />cultural gathering rights and also it sets forth other criteria. Introduced by Mr. Yagong, <br />first reading June 6th, 2012. <br />» Thank you. Vice Chair Pilago. <br />» Thank you, Chair Yagong. Motion to approve Bill 260 at second of three readings. <br />» Second. <br />» Second, second by Ms. Ford. Discussion? Here in Kona, go ahead, Ms. Ford. <br />» Thank you. I'm going to make some just generic comments about this. First of all I <br />support this resolu...this bill. I support it. We do need a game management advisory <br />commission and I want to for the public's benefit, I want to explain why it's going to <br />have hunters, fishermen, and gatherers on this commission and not scientists. The <br />scientists are supposed to be represented by DLNR. There are scientists that work for <br />DLNR and that provide input to DLNR. And just for the record, I'm not against science. I <br />was a biology major for a long time. And I'm also, I'll comment on the fact that I'm an <br />environmentalist, a conservationist, and preservationist. So I take some exception to some <br />of the things that have been said today. But with all of that the one thing that has not <br />really been addressed here is that our mountains, all five mountains, anything below the <br />mountain peaks, has to be a multifunctional situation. And by that I mean they have to <br />serve, all of our land has to serve many people with different agendas. We cannot just say <br />only the hunters or only the environmentalists. We have to share this island. With that <br />said, and I do believe in fencing some areas and that there are areas that are inappropriate <br />to have animals. However in this particular bill, 260, the game management advisory <br />commission, our hunters have been left out of the process. My family hunts. Both sides of <br />my family, both sides, my husband's family, have been hunters for a generation. I grew <br />up eating venison in case some of you missed my last discussion. I believe in hunting and <br />I believe that the hunters know more about hunting than anybody else. And I think that <br />it's part of the culture here, the native culture. And also the nonnative culture. So I will <br />support this game commission. I expect this commission to provide rules and suggestions <br />to DLNR on how we ought to do this a whole lot better than we've been doing it. And I <br />think these men and women will be able to do that. Whether or not DLNR is willing to <br />listen to our commission is another issue and it's pretty sad that we're going through this. <br />Let me just say that one of the testifiers commented on Bill 260 and 261 that Mr. Bill <br />Aila (sp?) of, the head of DLNR, contacted the mayor in some fashion. I don't know if it <br />was email or telephone or physically or satellite or ESP, I have no idea what the thing <br />was. And I wanted to find out if that was correct, that the state was actually contacting <br />our mayor and asking the mayor per the testimony to veto these bills. Because I find that <br />offensive. I got, I had my staff get in touch with Bobby Command. He said he can't find <br />anyone in the mayor's office to make a statement. The mayor is in a meeting and not <br />available. And there is no one available to confirm the statement that was made. I had my <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.