Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – September 24, 2018 <br />- Eco Systems are being managed by a handful of people and the public is <br />not involved in what goes on in these ecosystems nor in the management of <br />these ecosystems and it’s creating quite a bit of angst in a lot of places – it <br />has caused us to lose thousands of acres of recreation on the Big Island – <br />we’ve lost Mauna Kea so far – there are thousands of acres that they keep <br />taking from us almost on a daily basis. Eradications go on without concern to <br />the public and these are all decisions that are made by a handful of people <br />and you and I don’t have anything to say about it and what he’s saying is that <br />when you get into ecosystem management it is not – it is the public that <br />should be telling what we want to do with our ecosystems – what are the <br />choices we want to have for our lands and the public needs to be involved <br />rather than a bunch of people with a bunch of letters after their name – so it’s <br />an interesting discussion – this discussion has been going on now for the last <br />three years throughout the world, actually, people are getting a little <br />distressed and concerned about environmentalism in the sense that it’s <br />become pretty radical and there is a concern so this is one of those things <br />that you’re gonna be dealing with – ecosystem management is how they <br />manage Hawaii. They have a small area of plants here but they’ll take 1,000 <br />acres to protect them and within that 1,000 acres the number of animals that <br />are allowed resident in that 1,000 acres is what? Does anybody know? Zero... <br />Do you know how they came up with that zero number? Anybody? I was <br />shocked when I heard it and we actually heard it from Paul Bankoh and the <br />reason why it \[unclear\] zero is that there’s no argument – nobody’s deciding, <br />oh, maybe we can do five, oh, we can do seven. Zero is the number – so <br />that’s one of the concerns and the other concern that we have and H.B. 104 – <br />which I sent to you all – H. B. 104 is a bill that we turned in, in 2013 and it’s <br />time that we do it again in my opinion so I’d like to get you folks to look at it <br />and I want to bring it up at our next meeting if there’s any changes that you’d <br />like to make to it or you can see that you would like to make to it – but what <br />we’re asking with H.B. 104 is that our game was in our State Constitution – <br />it’s been in our State Constitution from the start. In 1978 or ’79 when we had <br />that Constitutional Convention they tried to take game animals out of the <br />Constitution and they were able to get it out of the written Constitution but <br />they weren’t able to ratify it and in 1979, as you know, we got sued and we <br />lost Mauna Kea and some of you think I’m a conspiracy guy but it just seems <br />to pat, actually. This thing has been a design and we would like to get our <br />game animals – we have H.C.R. – a House Concurrent Resolution which was <br />passed unanimously that says that our game animals have standing in <br />Hawaii. Our fishing has standing in Hawaii. We have value with our game. <br />And we would like to see that actually back in our Constitution and that’s what <br />H.B. 104 does. It’s very simple – it just says that we would like to have our <br />game animals back in it – it’s just a matter of two words – game animals – <br />that we want to put back in the Constitution. So that’s what H.B. 104 is all <br />about. <br /> <br />GH: Chair I have a question, this is Grayson. <br />30 <br /> <br /> <br />