Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission -3 September 14, 2018 <br />the other side of the island. I don't know whether that is a Charter thing that <br />needs to be amended or whether that is something that is internal to the Council, <br />but I think it is important that unless you have some conflict that you can't, like <br />you are an attorney and the Judge has set that hearing that day, that other than <br />something like that, when you run for office, I think you sign up for the service <br />which entails going back and forth. Not participating and routinely sitting on <br />your butt on one side of the island and not going and having the courtesy of being <br />in front of the populace on the other side of the island. So that's.one issue and I <br />am not sure where to go with that. <br />Two, on resolutions and this has bugged me, I loved it when I was on the Council, <br />but once I was in the cabinet, I looked at it a little differently. In Section 3-8, <br />when we refer to actions of the Council, it says "non -legislative acts may be by <br />resolution" which is not a problem. It's non -legislative so it doesn't need to go to <br />the Mayor to approve it, but when a resolution has the force and effect of law, to <br />me there should be some checks and balances between the Mayor's office and the <br />Council, and one of the areas I thought about is the fact that things like when you <br />set the real property tax rates, the Council sets it. The Mayor has no opportunity <br />to veto if he doesn't agree with the rates that have been set by the Council. And, <br />that has bothered me because the whole premise of the Charter is to have this <br />balancing of power and checks and balances, and that's one of the most important <br />areas that should have a check and balance and it's not set up in the Charter for <br />the Mayor to have an opportunity. So I just want to put that out there as <br />something that we should take a look at and the same thing with any other <br />resolutions that have the force and effect of law. If it has the force and effect of <br />law there should be some kind of checks and balances set up within the Charter. <br />Thank you. <br />MS. POINDEXTER: Yeah, and I agree with that and yet the Charter says no <br />resolution shall have the force and effect of law, so that is where I think your job <br />starts to look at those statements. Thank you. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Commissioner Galimba. <br />MS. GALIMBA: So yeah, following up on this discussion, is it possibly just a <br />case of practice rather than anything we need to change in the Charter. Just <br />people say "this is going to be a resolution and this is what we always do." Where <br />there's a resolutions, and it is law, when it really maybe shouldn't be a resolution. <br />It should be something else. <br />MS. POINDEXTER: Yeah, and that you would have to take up—I would leave <br />that up to Corp Counsel to advise you on that, but I know that no resolution <br />should have you know, the force and effect of Jaw. <br />MS. TODD: Mr. Chairman, if Commissioner Galimba <br />Page 17 <br />