Laserfiche WebLink
overseen as it is. So what is the thought process behind having residential owners coming in to <br />the Leeward Planning Commission with a Use Permit and applying? <br /> <br />YEE: Not for that specific location because, I don’t have all the details, but I think it’s clear <br />based on feedback we are getting that the intention was to address non-hosted rentals, so if there <br />is management of condo-hotels or other areas, you know, that’s some of the adjustments we <br />would want to make for those situations in condo-hotels. I don’t know this area that you are <br />referring to, well enough to — <br /> <br />UNGER: I’m just referring to a single-family residence in Kūki‘o Resort Subdivision that is <br />offering short-term vacation rentals. I imagine they have a property manager and is overseen by <br />the homeowners association, etcetera, etcetera. <br /> <br />YEE: I would generally say right now the bill would have them come in for a certificate, <br />nonconforming use certificate. And again, the intention there from the bill is to have <br />management in residential areas. Again, you know, whether, the problems we are having in <br />other areas where they were, you know, being problematic were in residential areas, and so this <br />was the fix. The unintended places that may have heavy management stuff is what we have to <br />consider. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Okay, Recommendation No. 6 is to add the following section to the bill, to the bill’s <br />permitted uses section: “Special Permits in the State Land Use Agricultural district shall not be <br />issued to permit short-term vacation rentals in farm dwellings since State law requires farm <br />dwellings to be used to house farm workers rather than vacationers.” And, as I mentioned <br />before, you should have received a letter from the State Land Use Commission that confirms this <br />position that State law allows the Planning Commission to issue Special Permits for any land use <br />that is reasonable and unusual and is consistent with State law, as well as the Zoning Code, <br />related to lands within the Agricultural district, even if the land use is not specifically listed in <br />the Zoning Code as a permitted use for that zoning district. So in this case Bill 108 as it’s <br />drafted now does not specifically say in the Agricultural district short-term vacation rentals are <br />permitted. But there is still the Special Permit mechanism that can be used through the Planning <br />Commission to permit any use on State land. And so this recommendation is basically saying <br />since short-term vacation rentals are un-hosted meaning there is no owner on site that’s actively <br />farming the property, that allowing short-term vacation rentals even through a Special Permit in <br />the Agricultural district would not be consistent with State law. And so that is the reason for <br />wanting to add the section. <br /> <br />KEALOHA: Can I — \[checking the microphone\] <br /> <br />DARROW: You are on. <br /> <br />KEALOHA: Can I just clarify that we are talking about both farm-dwellings as well as <br />additional farm-dwellings? <br /> <br />JACKSON: That’s correct. <br /> <br />14 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />