2018-09-24 BDHRA Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SELF: It's not a master plan. It's a conceptual plan. ONISHL Yeah, well, I mean SELF: So it's not going to be a master, in addition to the master plan you have to have this other plan to determine the relocation of persons who are going to be displaced. That step has not been taken yet. ONISHL But that doesn't have to be part of the master plan? SELF: I think it would be, yes. Because that determines what you can do with that property once—that has to be another step. You have to take care—that has to be something that's considered when you're doing the master plan. So I would think that they would need to work with the County Housing Office, but I think before that can happen, DLNR has to make a decision as to what they're going to do with the month-to-month leases. Because all of them are on month-to-month right now. All the buildings that are being used right now, right? ONISHL Well, if I might, I think DLNR's concerned with certain properties is what is going to be the master plan. So they're not going to issue leases to these properties unless one of two things happen. One, the current lessee is willing to make the investments to bring it up to a long- term standard, right? And that get approved by DLNR board, or this master plan that is being defaulted to the County because of the County's decision to set up this agency to plan this whole thing occurs. So, I think from the State's standpoint, we're caught in between what you guys wanna do, and the requirements of DLNR to move forward. Because, you know, I mean, there's two properties already that moved forward with long term leases. Now how does that affect the master plan because, you know, I think Naniloa, right, when this agency was created I don't think that was finalized. I might be mistaken but HEIT: Oh no, it was. ONISHL It was. Okay. So, you know, I mean if the State keeps going out and putting long term leases on property with their considerations and not yours, how does that affect the so- called plan that you guys have come up with? TANIGUCHI: If I may? GADDIS: Yeah. TANIGUCHI: I think the problem is just what you said. What's going to happen, and if the State wants that, it's their land, that's fine. They're going to have to—he's going to be pushed into a position where, okay, what does Don have to do, or anything have to do to meet what the State wants. What does the State want? You want to move in 50 feet because of sea level rise, or 5 feet, whatever it is? Even that is not determined. So ONISHL Okay TANIGUCHI: what I was saying is that if we're satisfied to have Banyan just rebuild whatever's there, not just put enough money to get another 55 year lease, then go. That's fine. Page 10 of 19 Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment Agency September 24,2018 Minutes