Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and they are working on modifying it. A brown water event is not designed just for a sewer <br />overflow, because every sewer overflow and discharge has to be reported and documented. <br />During Hurricane Lane, in which 54 inches of rain was received in four days, the brown <br />water advisory was because of the surface runoff due to the excessive amount of water. It <br />is his understanding that the DOH puts the advisory out. There is a lot of runoff from <br />rainwater which is not in any way, shape, or form associated with a wastewater treatment <br />plant. DEM did have a discharge from the Pua Pump Station which went to the discharge <br />point 3/4 a mile offshore. Minimal ground surface water was contaminated. Sewer lids <br />popped due to the excess water coming into the systems. Those were discharged and <br />reported. Brown water advisories are designed by the DOH to keep people out of the <br />water. The brown water alert during Hurricane Lane was not directly associated with <br />sewer system overflows, but rather because the storm water impacted the beaches. <br /> <br />Director Kucharski further stated that Councilmember Chung has asked for a <br />presentation from DEM and other departments on October 2, 2018, and he will be <br />providing the data to the Council. He can provide the data to the EMC. Brown water does <br />not mean it is from the sewer—it is from a rain event. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pequeño asked about signage, as he went to the beaches a few days <br />after the storm and there were homemade signs taped to poles. Director Kucharski said <br />that signage was put up by individuals and was not from the state or county. The DOH has <br />the legislative responsibility for determining when signage is necessary. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pequeño said it is a shame when nothing is done because it is not <br />required, as in the case of the state not putting up signage. Director Kucharski said the <br />state made a determination that the signs were not necessary—it was not that they didn’t <br />feel like it. Their responsibility is to determine when signage is necessary and required. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gaffney asked about signage specificity. Director Kucharski said <br />DEM has signage approved by the state. If there is a release and a beach needs to be closed <br />or a warning sign is required, DEM posts signs. Where they are posted is determined and <br />approved by the DOH. He can provide a picture of one of their signs at the next meeting. <br /> <br />6. REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE <br /> <br />a. Director’s Informational Report <br /> <br />• Status of the proposed Pāhala and Nāālʻehu wastewater treatment plants: <br />A lawsuit has been filed against the County. Therefore, any discussion in <br />open session will be limited. If they want more of a breakdown, he can <br />provide it in executive session. <br /> <br />Chair Bennett said that the EA has been published in The Environmental Notice, and <br />it contains statements the EMC should speak to. Director Kucharski said there is a 30-day <br />comment period, and informational meetings are scheduled on October 8, 9, and 10 in <br />Pāhala. The meetings on October 8 and 9 are geared toward people who will be connected. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />