My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
September 26, 2018 Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of Aging
>
Committee on Aging
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
September 26, 2018 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2018 9:32:22 AM
Creation date
10/31/2018 9:32:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Committee on Aging Meeting Minutes <br />of September 26, 2018 <br />Page 2 <br />4. COMMENTS FROM THE CHAIR: Meizhu Lui stated that we have some important <br />issues to discuss. <br />a. Get updated on the development of the 4 -Year Area Plan; <br />b. Hear about the investigation as to whether we should continue to contract out <br />case management services or bring them in-house; <br />C. Decide whether to form an ad hoc legislative sub -committee as proposed by <br />Lito at the last meeting. <br />5. STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: No statement from the public. <br />6. EXECUTIVE REPORT AND UPDATES: C. Kimo Alameda and Staff <br />Kimo explained that the Hawai'i County Office of Aging's business model differs <br />from that of the State in several ways - <br />1 . <br />ays:1. Vendor Pool: Hawaii County has the ability to provide services from various <br />vendors in a pool; they can be rotated as needed. Unlike other islands, the con- <br />tracts are not put out to bid. This allows for an easier flow to obtain services. <br />2. Needs Based Services: The goal is to not keep a Kupuna Care client in the <br />system forever. Hawaii County focuses on developing an exit strategy to move <br />people from formal to informal care by strengthening the "circle" of care and <br />services around the client. This way Hawaii County can serve more people <br />rather than having people die on the waitlist. <br />3. Kupuna Care: Once the Kupuna Care Caregiver funds are exhausted, caregiv- <br />ers can be transitioned to Title IIIE Funds. <br />4. We do not do case management for single service clients. It's not necessary! <br />5. Case Management: Kimo and staff are looking at the possibility of changing the <br />current model to bring case management in-house; there could be cost savings. <br />The committee raised a number of points: <br />• The benefit of the current model is that it provides a quality check system <br />since we are not evaluating ourselves! <br />• Lito suggested a possible model where Services for Seniors would be a <br />consultant. <br />• The Older Americans Act which created agencies like the Hawaii County <br />Office of Aging (HCOA) emphasized a planning function by governmental <br />entities rather than delivering services. <br />• The Committee asked that decisions made be not only on the basis of <br />money, but on how to deliver the best services. <br />• Karen Davis from Services for Seniors noted that they are the main con- <br />tracted vendor. She asked that if the business model for Hawaii County <br />changes that they are kept in the loop. She appreciates the transparency <br />and the invitation to attend these meetings. Karen shared that this fiscal <br />year she was able to save $11 K and remains fiscally conscious. <br />Kimo has asked the State to bring all the County Executives together so <br />they can share their business models and learn from each other. For <br />example, Kimo discovered from other Execs that a physician's note is not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.