Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: But, II think it would be clear to say, clearer for the bill to either list all of <br />those places where it's permitted or say it's permitted everywhere except, and list all those place <br />where it's not permitted. I mean, just to make it, you would be able to look on any zoning map <br />and say, well, yes, there, yes, there, no. Rather than have to look at a zoning map and then look <br />at a General Plan to see where the Resort Nodes are. <br />JACKSON: Right, but I think the County Council wanted to not allow it in every RM zoning <br />district. They only wanted to allow it in the RM zoning districts in Resort areas, and so that's <br />why they made that distinction. So, like I said, this recommendation is keeping that intent of <br />what Council is recommending or proposing, but restructuring it to fit in that Zoning Code style <br />more. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, thank you. <br />JACKSON: Any other questions on that one? John? Okay. All right, recommendation number <br />six is to add the following language to the first section where—let me just make sure I have that <br />right. Yeah, so this would be added to that very first section on page 1 under (A) probably as a <br />number three, yeah, number three after number two. Do you see where that is on page 1 of the <br />bill, (a)(1), this would be (3). So "Special Permits in the State land use agricultural district shall <br />not be issued to permit short-term vacation rentals in farm dwellings since State law requires <br />farm dwellings be used to house farm workers rather than vacationers." <br />And, again, the reason for this, as I mentioned before, was that State law allows the <br />Commissions to issue a Special Permit for any land use that is reasonable and unusual and is <br />consistent with State land use law related to lands within the Agricultural District, even if the <br />land use is not specifically listed in the Zoning Code as a permitted use for that zoning district. <br />So, in this case, the way the bill is set up, short-term vacation rentals are not listed as a permitted <br />use in the agricultural zoning district, but as you know, the Commission still has the authority to <br />grant a Special Permit for any use in the State Land Use Agricultural District. <br />So, let's see, where was I? And, as we discussed before, farm dwellings are all dwellings <br />situated on lots created after June 4th, 1976. Farm dwellings are also additional farm dwellings <br />on lots created before June 1976 in the State Land Use Agricultural District. They are defined as <br />a Single -Family dwelling located on and used in connection with a farm or where ag activity <br />provides income to the family occupying the dwelling. Since a short-term vacation rental is <br />defined in the bill as "un -hosted," there would be no one on-site that would work on the farm or <br />gain income from working on the farm. Typically, visitors that come to work on farms for ag <br />tourism experience are staying in a "hosted" vacation rental rather than an "un -hosted" short- <br />term vacation rental. So, that's the reason for this proposed language in the permitted uses or <br />permitted areas section. Are there any questions on that recommendation from the Commission? <br />REPLOGLE: Yes, so let's say you were a coffee farmer and you have housing for workers and <br />when it's not coffee season, you are allowed to have those as vacation rentals on ag zoned land? <br />JACKSON: No. As un -hosted vacation rentals? <br />EXHIBIT C <br />14 <br />