Laserfiche WebLink
rentals taking over certain communities. I really want to emphasize to the Commissioners this <br />point. This is about the protection of a lifestyle for Hawaii. This is about not becoming Maui, <br />Kauai, and Oahu where they will all admit, all of them will admit, living on those counties are no <br />longer possible for the middle-class family. All you have to do is look at the median cost of any <br />home and its $750,000 and above. All you have to do is look at certain of the ideal places of this <br />island and see how vacation rentals have multiplied. And, that is what is being threatened, <br />because the very words that are up there. I don't know if it's the same side of Maui, Kauai, and <br />Oahu finding out that this is a very, very profitable business, and I guess it's just common sense. <br />I had a beautiful place that was destroyed by this past lava, and the beauty of it was not my <br />simple home. It was the beauty of what people find so unusually exciting to see of Hawaii that <br />those of us who are born and raised here, we don't even think much about it sometimes. And, I <br />was stunned when we were doing the survey of how many of those homes were vacation rentals, <br />because I bought it in 1971 when I didn't even know what the term vacation rentals meant <br />because it was nonexistent. And, in that short time, we were almost like 50 percent vacation <br />rentals and going because the people that were buying it or fixing it, finding out how very <br />lucrative it is and I don't fault anyone for making money. I read in the paper where, some of the <br />testifiers stated that they need this money to supplement their income to survive. Obviously, <br />who fights that, you know? That's a problem of almost everyone. <br />I'm appealing to this Commission and the people of the audience, not knowing who you are, this <br />is about the protection of a lifestyle for the people of Hawaii. This is about the importance of <br />what makes this island very special [inaudible] place else of planning and that is our zoning. We <br />have to have zoning, or you will make, not you, but we will make a policy unwritten that says <br />use of land will be determined by who can buy the land and use the land. It is of government <br />that protects the use of land for multiple purposes, including a home. I have nothing against <br />vacation rentals. I am for zoning. I am for the protection of a lifestyle that the people out there <br />depend on us to protect them, no different, as I explained to Mr. Yee, this isn't about vacation <br />rentals. This is about zoning that I live in a residential area, and I know I will not have a, bad <br />example but, I won't have a service station next to me banging in the middle of the night or <br />whatever because the zoning will prohibit that. It is of the laws that protects a lifestyle. This is <br />no different. <br />So, to the audience behind me, it is not the fault of, you know, making additional income or <br />whatever of investment. And, even that today questions a change because of the Department, not <br />Department of Education, but of property tax of the investment property. By the way, I don't <br />even know what that means. Every property is an investment property to me. <br />But, I need this Commission to really fully understand what this is all about. This is the <br />protection of a lifestyle for the people of this land. This is to ensure that certain kind of <br />businesses, infrastructure, etc., etc., will not infringe because their zoning protects them. Just <br />imagine if we don't act on this like we did not act on it for the past few years where it was not a <br />problem to what the problem is today. Can you imagine what it will be ten years from now or <br />even a year from now? <br />EXHIBIT C <br />21 <br />